Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758955Ab3GRNaZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:30:25 -0400 Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:38944 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754195Ab3GRNaW (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:30:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:30:08 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: CAI Qian , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Sarah Sharp , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , stable , Darren Hart , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Maybe it's time to shut this thread down (Was: Re: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review) Message-ID: <20130718133008.GC30405@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , CAI Qian , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Sarah Sharp , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Guenter Roeck , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , stable , Darren Hart , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org References: <20130715155202.GC29526@xanatos> <20130715184642.GE15531@xanatos> <20130715195316.GF15531@xanatos> <1368728064.2419741.1374117402465.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <1374119254.6458.220.camel@gandalf.local.home> <305037674.2433057.1374120078349.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> <20130718132327.GB30405@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130718132327.GB30405@thunk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1567 Lines: 34 The reason why I started the kernel summit over ten years ago was because there were certain topics that are much better discussed in person, and that over time, if we don't have sufficient face to face interactions, the quality of e-mail discussions can start to become frayed. One of the reasons is that e-mail is just not as expressive a medium as face-to-face conversations. As a result, when people feel that they aren't being heard, because they aren't getting those critical non-verbal cues, they start escalating. They start using stronger words, such as F*CK. They start doing exactly what they claim to abhor to their verbal opponents in the debate, which is describing their fellow kernel developers using demeaning terms. They start using loaded, and over-reaching words, like "abuse", which ultimately ends up hurting their own case. I suspect this is happening because it's easy when a body feels that their message of say, "could we please treat each other with more respect", isn't getting heard, it's very easy and very tempting to resort to "Linus is an AB-UUUUUUUU-SER!". May I make the polite suggestion (and we'll see how well polite requests get honored via e-mail), that we take this discussion off-line, and wait to try to discuss this in person at the Kernel Summit? Regards, - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/