Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:10:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:10:09 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.138]:56839 "EHLO smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 11:09:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 17:14:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: "J.A. Magallon" cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , Brendan J Simon , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel , kbuild-devel Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: linux kernel conf 0.8 In-Reply-To: <20021009144502.GD2954@werewolf.able.es> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 970 Lines: 28 Hi, On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, J.A. Magallon wrote: > >stick with TCL/TK, like xconfig currently uses ? > >or is it not sufficient? or just too ugly? > > > > What is linux kernel conf written in ? > - perl: use perl-gtk (I think there is also a perl-qt) > - python: use py-gtk... > > Use whatever the language gives. I never undestook why use tcl/tk > on a perl/python config system. With the exception of the X interface everything is in C, what makes it difficult to use script languages, one always needs some extra development package installed. That's the main reason for creating a library backend, a lot can already be packaged by distributions and only the library needs to be built from the current kernel. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/