Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:31:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:31:25 -0400 Received: from ns0.cobite.com ([208.222.80.10]:14091 "EHLO ns0.cobite.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:31:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:36:57 -0400 (EDT) From: David Mansfield X-X-Sender: david@admin To: Benjamin LaHaise cc: Ingo Molnar , Subject: Re: [patch] silence an unnescessary raid5 debugging message Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1463 Lines: 37 >LVM manages to trigger the "raid5: switching cache buffer size" printk >quiet voluminously when using a snapshot device. The following patch >disables it by placing it under the debugging PRINTK macro. Ben (and Ingo), I happen to hit this message thousands of times per second sometimes under normal operation in certain loads (raw devices for oracle and fs on LVM on raid5). I understand that it's annoying, I actually think it shouldn't be removed, because it's telling the operator importantn information. As I understand it, the message is indicating a really bad performance problem (i.e a complete flush of the stripe cache), and that anyone encountering it on a very frequent (i.e. annoying) basis should consider changing their setup. Encountering this message has forced us to plan to split the single raid5 we have into two, in order to satisfy the different request sizes of the raw-device vs. the ext3 fs. David P.S. Is there any hope of fixing this issue so that the stripe cache can handle different sized requests? Possibly is this a bug in LVM? -- /==============================\ | David Mansfield | | david@cobite.com | \==============================/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/