Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:38:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:38:10 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:8210 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:38:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:45:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alexander Viro cc: Patrick Mochel , Subject: Re: [bk/patch] driver model update: device_unregister() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 907 Lines: 23 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Alexander Viro wrote: > > It makes sense, but that should be done for gendisk. I.e. we should have > (name, base, range) - not a node for each partition. Actually, we _do_ want to have a node for each partition, if we want to show the things that are associated with one particular partition. And we do have those things - mounts and (onc eit's working again) LVM relationships etc. It's a perfectly valid question to ask "what partitions are part of this extended disk?" or "which partition is the backing store for this filesystem?". Which implies that a partition is a real first-class entity, not just "one of a range". Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/