Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761106Ab3GSSmh (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:42:37 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:51200 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752697Ab3GSSmf (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:42:35 -0400 Message-ID: <51E98897.6050105@linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:42:31 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130630 Icedove/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Shtylyov CC: George Cherian , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, balbi@ti.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, kishon@ti.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm: dts: Add USB phy nodes for AM33XX References: <1374237277-17769-1-git-send-email-george.cherian@ti.com> <1374237277-17769-4-git-send-email-george.cherian@ti.com> <51E94571.8080805@cogentembedded.com> <51E94B30.9070805@linutronix.de> <51E98663.2040308@cogentembedded.com> In-Reply-To: <51E98663.2040308@cogentembedded.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1644 Lines: 56 On 07/19/2013 08:33 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. Hello, >> usb: usb@47400000 { >> compatible = "ti,am33xx-usb"; >> >> usb0_phy: phy@47401300 { >> compatible = "ti,am335x-usb-phy"; >> } >> usb0: usb@47401000 { >> musb0: usb@47401400 { >> compatible = "mg,musbmhdrc"; >> } >> } >> usb1_phy: phy@47402300 { >> compatible = "ti,am335x-usb-phy"; >> } >> usb1: usb@47402000 { >> musb1: usb@47402400 { >> compatible = "mg,musbmhdrc"; >> } >> } >> } > >> And you want usb0_phy to be child of usb0? In the TRM they are all in >> the same block. > > Ah, the fact that PHYs didn't have the "reg" property got me muddled, > I didn't pay attention to the address part of the node names... BTW, > where is the "reg" prop? I skipped it for the general idea. I planned to repost is today but I messed up dsps and need to get it working first? > I see PHYs share the address space with > "omap-control-usb@44e10620" device -- what's the point with this? I decided to get rid of this. Both phys have 8 bytes (2 registers) which are exclusive for them. There is one register for the wakeup which is shared by both. I changed this to limit it only to the 8bytes per phy. I care about wakeup later - hopefully George will take care of this :) > >> Sebastian > > WBR, Sergei > Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/