Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754137Ab3GTOAh (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:00:37 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:44134 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753967Ab3GTOAf (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:00:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 07:00:15 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, walken@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: mlockall triggred rcu_preempt stall. Message-ID: <20130720140015.GA5860@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20130719145323.GA1903@redhat.com> <20130719221538.GH21367@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130720003212.GA31308@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130720003212.GA31308@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: No X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13072014-5406-0000-0000-00000AA4D3D5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1302 Lines: 31 On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 08:32:12PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:15:39PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:53:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > My fuzz tester keeps hitting this. Every instance shows the non-irq stack > > > came in from mlockall. I'm only seeing this on one box, but that has more > > > ram (8gb) than my other machines, which might explain it. > > > > Are you building CONFIG_PREEMPT=n? I don't see any preemption points in > > do_mlockall(), so a range containing enough vmas might well stall the > > CPU in that case. > > That was with full preempt. > > > Does the patch below help? If so, we probably need others, but let's > > first see if this one helps. ;-) > > I'll try it on Monday. Given full preempt, I wouldn't think that my patch would have any effect, but look forward to hearing what happens. Hmmm.... Were you running mlockall() concurrently from a bunch of different processes sharing lots of memory via mmap() or some such? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/