Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755151Ab3GVCLH (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:11:07 -0400 Received: from hop-nat-141.emc.com ([168.159.213.141]:42684 "EHLO mexforward.lss.emc.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753246Ab3GVCLF (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:11:05 -0400 From: "Peng, Tao" To: Paul Bolle , Greg Kroah-Hartman CC: Alexandru Juncu , Pekka Enberg , "andreas.dilger" , LKML Subject: RE: [PATCH] lustre:libcfs: remove redundant code. Thread-Topic: [PATCH] lustre:libcfs: remove redundant code. Thread-Index: AQHOhI8JQ24YrnFsCkuay7Do0XLq/5lsXYWAgAABloCAAAIMgIAAAlMAgAAE0QCAAAXEAIADiPdw Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 02:07:37 +0000 Message-ID: <1882637210201641A747464075FFC6490E5A7562@MX101CL02.corp.emc.com> References: <1374245148-24031-1-git-send-email-alexj@rosedu.org> <20130719154648.GA23116@kroah.com> <1374250046.15242.7.camel@x61.thuisdomein> In-Reply-To: <1374250046.15242.7.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.32.218.56] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EMM-MHVC: 1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id r6M2BLPO006775 Content-Length: 1063 Lines: 29 > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Bolle [mailto:pebolle@tiscali.nl] > Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 12:07 AM > To: Greg Kroah-Hartman > Cc: Alexandru Juncu; Pekka Enberg; andreas.dilger; Peng, Tao; driverdev; LKML > Subject: Re: [PATCH] lustre:libcfs: remove redundant code. > > On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 08:46 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Doesn't matter, if there are no users, please just remove it. > > Is that, basically, your approach to staging cleanups? > > I ask because I noticed that "drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/gss/" > is only built if CONFIG_PTLRPC_GSS is set. But the corresponding Kconfig > symbol is nowhere to be found. > That's my fault. We certainly _want_ the ptlrpc gss code. I'll get it fixed. Thanks, Tao > Or do you prefer that I poke the people involved in (this case in) > Lustre before suggesting a drastic cleanup like that? > > > Paul Bolle > ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?