Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755468Ab3GVNnd (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:43:33 -0400 Received: from 217-155-41-104.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk ([217.155.41.104]:49652 "EHLO centos1.newflow.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753721Ab3GVNnc (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:43:32 -0400 Message-ID: <51ED3703.9060703@newflow.co.uk> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:43:31 +0100 From: Mark Jackson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Jones CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, linus.walleij@stericsson.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] ARM: ux500: Remove '0x's from HREF v60+ DTS file References: <1374490361-25769-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <51ED26C6.6000004@newflow.co.uk> <20130722134107.GB26801@laptop> In-Reply-To: <20130722134107.GB26801@laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1544 Lines: 50 On 22/07/13 14:41, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Mark Jackson wrote: > >> On 22/07/13 11:52, Lee Jones wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts >>> index 3d580d6..46fd8af 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts >>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ >>> >>> soc { >>> i2c@80110000 { >>> - bu21013_tp@0x5c { >>> + bu21013_tp@5c { >> >> Just a query ... why this one .... ^^^ ... >> >>> reset-gpio = <&gpio4 15 0x4>; >> >> ... and not this one .................................. ^^^ ? >> >>> }; >>> }; >>> >> >> The same for all the other patches in this series. >> >> If this is by design, it might be worth mentioning why some are >> removed and not others. > > I can't explain why there seems to be inconsistencies between node > names and the remaining properties. The best I can do is refer you to > the documentation where you can see that this is the standard: > > Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt > and > http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage Ho, ho ... don't you just love "standards" !! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/