Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757448Ab3GVPeK (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:34:10 -0400 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.7]:61807 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews04.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756670Ab3GVPeJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:34:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1374507247.15242.26.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2 From: Paul Bolle To: Kiko Piris Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:34:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130722151653.GA7213@sacarino.pirispons.net> References: <20130722151653.GA7213@sacarino.pirispons.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 (3.6.4-3.fc18) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2013 15:34:07.0606 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7977960:01CE86F0] X-RcptDomain: vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1851 Lines: 50 On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 17:16 +0200, Kiko Piris wrote: > linux-3.10.1 introduced a regression in cpufreq breaking suspend/resume > cycle for some people [1]. The upstream commit that probably will fix the regression that Kiko ran into is aae760ed21cd690fe8a6db9f3a177ad55d7e12ab ("cpufreq: Revert commit a66b2e to fix suspend/resume regression"). It's only part of v3.11-rc2 and was committed with a Cc: 3.10+ tag. So I'd guess that fix will be part of a future v3.10.y (stable) releases. > There were also some other threads about it in lkml. > > I see 3.10.2-stable was released some days ago. I couldn’t see anything > about fixing this regression reported in the changelog. > > And to be 110% certain, I compiled it and tried suspending/resuming; > it’s still broken. > > Is this going to be fixed in 3.10 stable branch? > > Thank you very much in advance. Note that I already suggested to Kiko to try that patch (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/14/35 ). I don't know whether Kiko tried it, as I never received a reply to my suggestion. So, for now, I can only say that that patch will probably fix the issue. > [1] first commit that bisect informed as introducing the regression: > > | commit c02527487f0c8feb578c0394ad481a97f26d3bd2 > | Author: Srivatsa S. Bhat > | Date: Mon Jul 1 00:40:55 2013 +0200 > | > | cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume > | > | commit f51e1eb63d9c28cec188337ee656a13be6980cfd upstream. > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux.kernel/LUi1pFCxbSI Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/