Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:54:56 +0200
From: Kiko Piris <kernel@pirispons.net>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2
Message-ID: <20130722155456.GA7836@sacarino.pirispons.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Kiko Piris <kernel@pirispons.net>,
	Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com
References: <20130722151653.GA7213@sacarino.pirispons.net>
 <1374507247.15242.26.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1374507247.15242.26.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
User-Agent: Mutt
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1113
Lines: 32

On 22/07/2013 at 17:34 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:

> Note that I already suggested to Kiko to try that patch (see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/14/35 ). I don't know whether Kiko tried
> it, as I never received a reply to my suggestion. So, for now, I can
> only say that that patch will probably fix the issue.

Hi,

Aww! :(

I saw your message and was going to apply it, but I didn’t fully
understand that thread and wasn’t sure exactly what patch I was supposed
to try and above what version should I apply it (my “kernel skills” are
very very limited).

Then I just went back to 3.10.0 and forgot about it (until I saw the
3.10.2 release announcement). Sorry about that!

If you want me to test any patch, I would be more than happy to do so; I
would be grafeful if you told me exactly what patch to apply and above
which kernel version.

Cheers!

-- 
Kiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/