Message-ID: <51ED6484.1070306@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:27:40 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120828 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CC: Kiko Piris <kernel@pirispons.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
        Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2
References: <20130722151653.GA7213@sacarino.pirispons.net> <51ED4E2D.5020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130722165355.GA18371@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130722165355.GA18371@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 952
Lines: 27

On 07/22/2013 10:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:52:21PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> And both of them have been CC'ed to -stable. So they should be hitting
>> the stable tree soon.
>>
>> Hmm, that reminds me.. whenever a patch cc'ed to stable hit the mainline,
>> the patch signers used to receive an automatic email from Greg. I didn't
>> get that for the above two patches.. Did the process change due to the
>> recent discussions around -stable tree maintenance?
> 
> No, it did not change, I just have 150+ pending patches for the
> 3.11-stable tree that I have yet to get through, give me a few weeks
> please.
> 

Oh! Sure, no problem.

Thank you!

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/