Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933024Ab3GVVYg (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:24:36 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]:52097 "EHLO mail-ob0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932316Ab3GVVYe (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:24:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1374419389.16533.86.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> References: <1374379903.3719.25@driftwood> <1374419389.16533.86.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:24:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] KS Topic request: Handling the Stable kernel, let's dump the cc: stable tag To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Rob Landley , James Bottomley , ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 745 Lines: 17 > I review what I can, but recently have often missed the 2 day review > period. > > Review from the authors and maintainers is probably more valuable than > that from generalists on the stable list. >From point of subsystem developers view, the problem is there are too many stable branches. I can't memorize what is different each other. Currently www.kernel.org lists two stable and five longterm branches. Who know all of them? Eventually I only checked them when I have enough much spare time. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/