Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:07:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:07:07 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:48908 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:07:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:14:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: george anzinger cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] High-res-timers part 2 (x86 platform code) take 5.1 In-Reply-To: <3DA4B1EC.781174A6@mvista.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 677 Lines: 19 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, george anzinger wrote: > > This patch, in conjunction with the "core" high-res-timers > patch implements high resolution timers on the i386 > platforms. I really don't get the notion of partial ticks, and quite frankly, this isn't going into my tree until some major distribution kicks me in the head and explains to me why the hell we have partial ticks instead of just making the ticks shorter. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/