Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:17:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:16:29 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:45224 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:15:40 -0400 Subject: Re: Why NFS server does not pass lock requests via VFS lock() op? From: Alan Cox To: Juan Gomez Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 10 Oct 2002 00:32:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1034206322.1970.105.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 743 Lines: 19 On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 00:11, Juan Gomez wrote: > > > > > Could anyone remind me of why NFS kernel would not pass byte range lock > requests to the underlying filsystem at the server side? > I think another person at IBM (Brian?) submitted a patch for this but such > patch never got included in the distribution. I know Matthew had the patches, and I know I looked at them and they seemed sane enough. But I don't know where they eventually went. Things like NFS over AFS are going to need it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/