Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:33:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:33:46 -0400 Received: from grue.ucsd.edu ([132.239.66.103]:12929 "EHLO grue.ucsd.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:33:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021009.163920.85414652.wlandry@ucsd.edu> To: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: A simple request (was Re: boring BK stats) From: Walter Landry X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1736 Lines: 40 Jeff Garzik wrote: > If you can't fit a whole tree including metadata into RAM, though, > BK crawls... Going from "bk citool" at the command line to actually > seeing the citool window approaches five minutes of runtime, on this > 200MB laptop... [my dual athlon with 512MB RAM corroborates your > numbers, though] "bk -r co -Sq" takes a similar amount of time... > > I also find that BK brings out the worst in the 2.4 kernel > elevator/VM... mouse clicks in Mozilla take upwards of 10 seconds to > respond, when "bk -r co -Sq" is running on this laptop [any other > read-from-disk process behaves similarly]. And running any two BK > jobs at the same time is a huge mistake. Two "bk -r co -Sq" runs > easily take four or more times longer than a single run. Ditto for > consistency checks, or any other disk-intensive activity BK indulges > in. Hello, What kind of CPU and hard drive do your two machines above have? I'm a developer for arch[1], and I'm wondering how fast things can get. Note: If you answer, you'll certainly be aiding arch development. It might be interpreted as "develop[ing] ... a product which contains substantially similar capabilities of the BitKeeper Software, or, in the reasonable opinion of BitMover, competes with the BitKeeper Software". So you might lose the ability to use the free license. But I'll let you decide if you want to help us. Thank you, Walter Landry wlandry@ucsd.edu [1] www.fifthvision.net/Arch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/