Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933627Ab3GWQ3j (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:29:39 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:45574 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932595Ab3GWQ3f (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:29:35 -0400 Message-ID: <51EEAF32.4040905@ti.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:58:34 +0530 From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Alan Stern , Tomasz Figa , Laurent Pinchart , , Sylwester Nawrocki , Sascha Hauer , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Stephen Warren , , Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework References: <51EE9EC0.6060905@ti.com> <20130723161846.GD2486@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20130723161846.GD2486@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2253 Lines: 67 Hi Greg, On Tuesday 23 July 2013 09:48 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 08:48:24PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tuesday 23 July 2013 08:07 PM, Alan Stern wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> >>>> On Tuesday 23 of July 2013 09:29:32 Tomasz Figa wrote: >>>>> Hi Alan, >>> >>> Thanks for helping to clarify the issues here. >>> >>>>>> Okay. Are PHYs _always_ platform devices? >>>>> >>>>> They can be i2c, spi or any other device types as well. >>> >>> In those other cases, presumably there is no platform data associated >>> with the PHY since it isn't a platform device. Then how does the >>> kernel know which controller is attached to the PHY? Is this spelled >>> out in platform data associated with the PHY's i2c/spi/whatever parent? . . . . >> >> static struct phy *phy_lookup(void *priv) { >> . >> . >> if (phy->priv==priv) //instead of string comparison, we'll use pointer >> return phy; >> } >> >> PHY driver should be like >> phy_create((dev, ops, pdata->info); >> >> The controller driver would do >> phy_get(dev, NULL, pdata->info); >> >> Now the PHY framework will check for a match of *priv* pointer and return the PHY. >> >> I think this should be possible? > > Ick, no. Why can't you just pass the pointer to the phy itself? If you > had a "priv" pointer to search from, then you could have just passed the > original phy pointer in the first place, right? > > The issue is that a string "name" is not going to scale at all, as it > requires hard-coded information that will change over time (as the > existing clock interface is already showing.) > > Please just pass the real "phy" pointer around, that's what it is there > for. Your "board binding" logic/code should be able to handle this, as > it somehow was going to do the same thing with a "name". The problem is the board file won't have the *phy* pointer. *phy* pointer is created at a much later time when the phy driver is probed. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/