Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:20:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:20:41 -0400 Received: from relay1.pair.com ([209.68.1.20]:27917 "HELO relay.pair.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 20:20:40 -0400 X-pair-Authenticated: 24.126.73.164 Message-ID: <3DA4CBC2.DA1A4A68@kegel.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 17:37:22 -0700 From: Dan Kegel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-3custom i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1841 Lines: 34 Larry McVoy wrote: > if you have 3-5 developers there is no reason to not use CVS, > it works well enough. ... > OK, now let's look at it as you grow. Most of our customers are in the > 25-100 developer range. They move very quickly and have lots of parallelism > in the code. So things like work flow and merging are critical, if that > doesn't work, the whole team slows down. Let's say we have a 60 seat sale. > That's $90K/year for BK. Let's say the engineers cost $100K/each (it > may be lower where you are but it's more like $180-220 here when you add > in building/mgmt/all the other overhead). So that's $6M/year in engineers. > The BK cost is 1.5% of that. You say that your guys are $50K/year? OK, > so we're at 3% of that. The point is that if BK makes your team 3% more > productive, it costs zero. > > And none of that includes the hardware costs, which are dramatically > cheaper for BK, it works on a laptop. Clearcase doesn't. Larry is spot on. I evaluated Clearcase, Bitkeeper, and Perforce recently for an 80 developer shop currently suffering with SourceSafe. Clearcase was ridiculously expensive and complex; I would never use it. Bitkeeper appeared to have *exactly* the features we wanted, and the price was not out of our range. We eventually settled on trying Perforce for a while because we know it could do most of what we needed, but it was a really tough call. Larry took the time to make sure we understood the issues, and I have a lot of respect for him. Anyone who says Larry is evil is smoking crack. He's good people. - Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/