Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933996Ab3GWVZ4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:25:56 -0400 Received: from mail-ye0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:39981 "EHLO mail-ye0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932956Ab3GWVZy (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:25:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:25:48 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Tang Chen Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, hpa@zytor.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, trenn@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org, jiang.liu@huawei.com, wency@cn.fujitsu.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, mgorman@suse.de, minchan@kernel.org, mina86@mina86.com, gong.chen@linux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com, lwoodman@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, jweiner@redhat.com, prarit@redhat.com, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com, yanghy@cn.fujitsu.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] x86, numa: Synchronize nid info in memblock.reserve with numa_meminfo. Message-ID: <20130723212548.GZ21100@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <1374220774-29974-1-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> <1374220774-29974-19-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1374220774-29974-19-git-send-email-tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 22 On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:59:31PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote: > Vasilis Liaskovitis found that before we parse SRAT and fulfill numa_meminfo, > the nids of all the regions in memblock.reserve[] are MAX_NUMNODES. That is > because nids have not been mapped at that time. > > When we arrange ZONE_MOVABLE in each node later, we need nid in memblock. So > after we parse SRAT and fulfill nume_meminfo, synchronize the nid info to > memblock.reserve[] immediately. Having a separate sync is rather nasty. Why not let memblock_set_node() and alloc functions set nid on the reserved regions? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/