Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:42:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:42:16 -0400 Received: from rj.SGI.COM ([192.82.208.96]:23214 "EHLO rj.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 21:42:16 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:08:34 MST." <20021009180834.A9206@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:47:48 +1000 Message-ID: <22401.1034214468@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 20 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:08:34 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: >"does anything hurt? No? Go use CVS. Come back when it hurts. >If it never hurts you should never pay for BK". For single users or a small team on a LAN, PRCS is much better than CVS Change sets, branching, merging, easy extraction from any version ... What is missing from PRCS is the distributed repository. Even Larry thinks that PRCS is good for single users. http://prcs.sourceforge.net/ prcs info linux-2.4 | wc -> 1179 changesets. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/