Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753140Ab3GXAVh (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:21:37 -0400 Received: from haggis.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.10]:46778 "EHLO members.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750762Ab3GXAVg (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:21:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:21:23 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Grant Likely Cc: Linus Walleij , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Mark Brown , linux-next , LKML Subject: Re: linux-next: status of various trees Message-Id: <20130724102123.6d1156925959e56640c23468@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20130723095513.19b9638ab4a19157e9834dcf@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.0beta4 (GTK+ 2.24.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA256"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__24_Jul_2013_10_21_23_+1000_.dPdQWpNIUeEw98m" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3066 Lines: 81 --Signature=_Wed__24_Jul_2013_10_21_23_+1000_.dPdQWpNIUeEw98m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Grant, On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:38:45 +0100 Grant Likely = wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > > > Currently linux-next has the following gpio trees: > > > > gpio-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/merge > > gpio git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#gpio/next > > gpio-lw git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/li= nux-gpio.git#for-next > > > > Given commit a0062d4e3a0a ("MAINTAINERS: Remove Grant Likely") in the > > devicetree-current tree today, should I remove the first two and rename > > the third to be just "gpio"? (And does Linus have an alternative > > "current" tree?) > > > > I also have the irqdomain tree: > > > > irqdomain git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git#irqdomain/next > > > > Should I remove that? And is there going to be an alternative? > > > > And for spi, I have: > > > > spi git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#spi/next > > spi-mb git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/s= pi.git#for-next > > > > again, should I remove the first and rename the second? >=20 > Yes on all of the above. Thanks. OK, I have done all that. I also removed the irqdomain-current and spi-current trees. So the trees I have left that you are responsible for are: devicetree-current git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/merge devicetree git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/next arm-dt git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/arm-next --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au --Signature=_Wed__24_Jul_2013_10_21_23_+1000_.dPdQWpNIUeEw98m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJR7x4HAAoJEECxmPOUX5FE5XcP/3K9+FhqjhuVVbCqtojCUJWl 0r5bSnQDzeU6CstEttGb5L1q8UGVxw6uxA/dyrqJhTXHN85FtqDt0JU8ETCM5Pxp ktPIhlYhdiGRwWVCr9qxUqgxwhLmzPqxA58FKWLpVq72ibQYHMvn00oFzT2qTcQ7 uwQEeHj/eI3b+CxKsVxyvGag2bqXxNiJXoSBaaILEltAGanaWC1NMgu8mH3sXPuU ds0sNZUZ+Yi4arC1LVZL5zN/7ad6KEwtNWA7R3x08fM4VaiPgYMQK1MUlZ4TkrkJ pH4UXQAvLxD/uBpiAdhlX6d/G/UQBRbiNKxlvRCBeOM29s0Bbd1fcilIHnnu65qv 0rnqYVaXdYjYPYDlYJ/7COfumJibLJgOLzWNacyHd3I2KX0YqYbtvBPoaA5f6dDp qorQha4jl6zaDkVSW5kVPa9Ogq0g2raBWCYnJJWkENJ51pSJfyhfxF4xH6FOhotj /xt5quhdKWRanI8mFIt+xTcywx+xCb51gLhfT7ZRrwFYjqzf6WaL0AQZXNnDrxLn cfnl9qctDWZeEOA8zJlhrUPdyM+pDAi1b+XAxbikLdErsXvjub8yKv8JExINCLuR WdENrBqFkMS9a3qUKce3lbl37jtmzBwquJszrxXWyIuRgogFhupU1nqcXN7p4CJZ i5v/9ZKbJpMltzh4pOd3 =IF66 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__24_Jul_2013_10_21_23_+1000_.dPdQWpNIUeEw98m-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/