Message-ID: <51EFA559.9050601@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:28:49 +0530
From: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpuidle/powernv: cpuidle backend driver for powernv
References: <20130723090111.7291.99479.stgit@deepthi.in.ibm.com> <20130723090137.7291.36657.stgit@deepthi.in.ibm.com> <20130723140645.GI31944@concordia>
In-Reply-To: <20130723140645.GI31944@concordia>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1059
Lines: 31

On 07/23/2013 07:36 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 02:31:41PM +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>> This patch implements a back-end cpuidle driver for
>> powernv calling power7_nap and snooze idle states.
>> This can be extended by adding more idle states
>> in the future to the existing framework.
> 
> Other than the state table and a few minor details this looks almost
> identical to the pseries driver. Can we not have a single version in
> sysdev and isolate just the differences?
>

Hi Michael,

Yes, I was actually looking at consolidating and moving all the powerpc
cpuidle driver code to drivers/cpuidle/. sysdev also seems fine. Let me
redo and club the drivers and have a single version of the code in
sysdev for both powerpc and powernv platforms.

Thanks !
Deepthi


> cheers
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/