Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755853Ab3GYLE7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:04:59 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:35270 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755668Ab3GYLE6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 07:04:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:04:47 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Michael Ellerman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net, mingo@redhat.com, Paul Mackerras , Anton Blanchard Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add support for pinned modifier Message-ID: <20130725110447.GS27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1374632802-15436-1-git-send-email-michael@ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1374632802-15436-1-git-send-email-michael@ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 562 Lines: 14 On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:26:42PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > I would have used "p" obviously, but that's taken. Are folks happy that > "P" is sufficiently different from "p"? I couldn't think of anything > better. I've seen proposals where 'P' is used for the max 'p' level :/ But yes, vexing situation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/