Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757381Ab3GYR7Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:59:16 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:54922 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757134Ab3GYR7L (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:59:11 -0400 Message-ID: <51F1676C.5050408@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:59:08 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olof Johansson CC: Catalin Marinas , Russell King - ARM Linux , Domenico Andreoli , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Dave P Martin , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Samuel Ortiz , "ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 753 Lines: 18 On 07/25/2013 09:09 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: ... > One problem that needs to be solved is obviously how a binding > graduates from tentative to locked. This work isn't going to be very > interesting to most people, I suspect. Think standards committee type > work. I assume that's part of what being a maintainer of the DT bindings tree means? +1 on everything else you said. I've been traveling this week so haven't had much time for email, but if I hadn't, I hope I would have said something similar:-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/