Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:04:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:04:13 -0500 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com ([207.175.42.156]:49169 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:04:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 17:02:12 -0500 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Horst von Brand Cc: Martin Dalecki , Peter Samuelson , Linux Kernel Developer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Recommended compiler? - Re: [patch] kernel/module.c (plus gratuitous rant) Message-ID: <20001030170212.X6207@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek In-Reply-To: <200010302050.e9UKo7312002@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010302050.e9UKo7312002@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl>; from vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl on Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:50:07PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 05:50:07PM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > Martin Dalecki said: > > Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [...] > > > > * Red Hat "2.96" or CVS 2.97 will probably break any known kernel. > > > Works fine for me and 2.4.0-test10-pre5... however there are tons of > > preprocessor warnings in some drivers. > > CVS (from 20001028 or so) gave a 2.4.0.10.6/i686 that crashed on boot, no > time to dig deeper yet. CVS 2.97 is known to miscompile e.g. buffer.c. Jakub - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/