Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757620Ab3GZOLD (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:11:03 -0400 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:33109 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754406Ab3GZOK7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:10:59 -0400 Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:10:16 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Richard Cochran Cc: David Woodhouse , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Russell King - ARM Linux , Ian Campbell , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Domenico Andreoli , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jason Gunthorpe , Dave P Martin , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Message-ID: <20130726141016.GF9858@sirena.org.uk> References: <20130725175702.GC22291@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <51F168FC.9070906@wwwdotorg.org> <20130725182920.GA24955@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20130725184834.GA8296@netboy> <20130725213753.GC17616@obsidianresearch.com> <20130726080115.GA5436@netboy> <1374831744.2923.42.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20130726130927.GC4219@netboy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VXtJLXyETdkgZBRU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130726130927.GC4219@netboy> X-Cookie: You will be awarded some great honor. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1746 Lines: 43 --VXtJLXyETdkgZBRU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:09:29PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > Unless I totally misunderstood, the thread is talking about letting > established bindings change with each new kernel version. I am > opposed to that. No, nobody is really saying that is a particularly good idea. There is some debate about how we work out what an established binding is but there's no serious suggestion that we don't want stable bindings. --VXtJLXyETdkgZBRU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR8oNFAAoJELSic+t+oim92HMP/jhyJiSZP5hs+avasx0+6kVf Ol/m2xS8+s3vU2EO5ZFwTniG5qvSAfrGqF+wPPh6/16hQqhZS28oA1ezvySGOSM0 +YJ/yXQRtt9abnZqsDw/5gu3TYuV1oZPLclKlugSxErGAJD1r+7Nh2VcPn1dudXl ksYWofOeB6lJv7yUV9LtXQMvRFeEhroMt9+2bzDAd2JE8Eb8ixe0cEElRem4IyOz +XpOWY4WJtrhypmPL+SMGf90DKJ4YJHSG+QxKLSrOpqAFG0XKSBAkvNgnBb+8iHR 8Gw2FTvUB+2noLodtgs4AuBdHlj3JKsZQFfK+//vHrL0L/mZHAEOGfDQDug0Fn9H kjP+Ti0I+oqYpRAi0UmrBbKI2wGxtoZ/774x1SBUxBKXxSpyRlMKGAs0fMGG8nR9 CTsCct0ZJRb70emfmEdK05pJj+AjaCGjYBXDmnzwUrba9roFp1eEczchq6lrqF/r 9VLkKwwIYCZ+sbp4wX668aJvG4k8SgErWkV+aWDfktPNzLfl+lAauram1sO58Noj YR4n/WpgV3PaoIsOY5cK9xhbM/K0nnVYuKn0GknGhVw1RqZ75Eo23TUR//kgekgO sHezEoKamVq1RrKj4dXZOy9YbC7iGE+/CrkKZwt84p47z2nq0j7bs56DXKo3ovBq tjAJAzE9nz0/wwyMHpOt =TZZy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VXtJLXyETdkgZBRU-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/