Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:31:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:31:36 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-020-143.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.20.143]:27075 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:31:35 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: two problems using EXT3 htrees Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 21:07:35 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Andrew_Purtell@NAI.com, tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1D4F16D4D695D21186A300A0C9DCF9838F611F@LOS-83-207.nai.com> <20021010170317.GI3045@clusterfs.com> In-Reply-To: <20021010170317.GI3045@clusterfs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 998 Lines: 22 On Thursday 10 October 2002 19:03, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Oct 10, 2002 15:08 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 October 2002 20:29, Andrew_Purtell@NAI.com wrote: > > > I recently patched my 2.4.19 kernel with EXT3 dir_index support and tried > > > it out on my 80GB EXT3 data partition... > > > > Could you please provide a pointer to the patch you used? > > A number of people have been getting this same bug under high load. I > believe they are using the patches from Ted, and/or BK extfs.bkbits.net. Does the Chris Lee flavor of the patch (before Ted's cleanups) exhibit the same bug? I suppose the pre-cleanup patch is incompatible with e2fsck because of the hash function change, but that would be easy to fix. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/