Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759941Ab3G0A0R (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:26:17 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:42490 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752417Ab3G0A0P (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:26:15 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Rik van Riel , Jeremy Eder Cc: Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, youquan.song@intel.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, Linux PM list Subject: Re: RFC: revert request for cpuidle patches e11538d1 and 69a37bea Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 02:36:20 +0200 Message-ID: <10589669.3DKeJru7h0@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.10.0+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1661917.srTpO55z5q@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <20130726173306.GB17985@jeder.rdu.redhat.com> <51F2C014.90102@redhat.com> <1661917.srTpO55z5q@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1845 Lines: 50 On Friday, July 26, 2013 11:48:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, July 26, 2013 02:29:40 PM Rik van Riel wrote: > > On 07/26/2013 02:27 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > On 7/26/2013 11:13 AM, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Could you try running the tests with just the repeat mode > > >> stuff from commit 69a37bea excluded, but leaving the common > > >> infrastructure and commit e11538? > > >> > > > > > > personally I think we should go the other way around. > > > revert the set entirely first, and now, and get our performance back > > > to what it should be > > > > > > and then see what we can add back without causing the regressions. > > > this may take longer, or be done in steps, and that's ok. > > > > > > the end point may well be the same... but we can then evaluate in the right > > > direction. > > > > Works for me. I have no objection to reverting both patches, > > if the people planning to fix the code prefer that :) > > OK, I'll queue up the reverts as fixes for 3.11-rc4. So, the reverts are on the fixes-next branch of the linux-pm.git tree that you can access at http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=fixes-next However, they are not simple reverts as we've had some non-trivial changes on top of those commits already, so I'd appreciate it a lot if somebody could double check if I didn't break anything in them. They are based on top of my master branch for now, but I'll rebase them on 3.11-rc3 when it's out. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/