Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:00:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:00:23 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:57579 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 16:00:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 13:02:40 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Dave McCracken Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , Linux Memory Management Subject: Re: Fork timing numbers for shared page tables Message-ID: <20021010200240.GV10722@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Dave McCracken , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , Linux Memory Management References: <167610000.1034278338@baldur.austin.ibm.com> <3DA5D893.CDD2407C@digeo.com> <175360000.1034279947@baldur.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <175360000.1034279947@baldur.austin.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 658 Lines: 21 On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 02:59:07PM -0500, Dave McCracken wrote: > I ran this test in three cases, 2.5.41, 2.5.41-mm2 without share, and > 2.5.41-mm2 with share. > Now for the results (all times are in ms): Hrm, it'd be nice to see how nicely this does things for things like 500GB-sized processes on 64-bit boxen... Any chance you could pass this test along for randomized benchmark type stuff? Thanks, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/