Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:54:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:54:49 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:44551 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:54:48 -0400 To: David Woodhouse Cc: "Steven French" , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jra@samba.org Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] CIFS filesystem for Linux 2.5 References: <17092.1034284232@passion.cambridge.redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 11 Oct 2002 00:00:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: David Woodhouse's message of "10 Oct 2002 23:17:56 +0200" Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 985 Lines: 21 David Woodhouse writes: > sfrench@us.ibm.com said: > > fs/cifs/md4.c | 209 +++ > > fs/cifs/md5.c | 363 +++++ > > fs/cifs/md5.h | 38 > > Unless these are somehow CIFS-specific, they should live in linux/lib/ This would have the disadvantage that they would need to be always compiled into the kernel, even though it may not need it. And we already have code bloat problems, no need to make it worse. Making them modular also isn't good. Each module takes a 4k page at least, so you would waste a lot of memory because they're smaller than 4k. As long as they are not used by anything else it's probably best to keep it where they are. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/