Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756711Ab3G3B76 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:59:58 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122]:14942 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752062Ab3G3B74 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:59:56 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=P6i4d18u c=1 sm=0 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:17 a=Drc5e87SC40A:10 a=yamZY-bhXjEA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=meVymXHHAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=6PEQZdHCN9wA:10 a=KfFBZPgXhdaFFKRaZrEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Sro2XwOs0tJUSHxCKfOySw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 67.255.60.225 Message-ID: <1375149595.6580.59.camel@gandalf.local.home> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] tracing: Change remove_event_file_dir() to clear "d_subdirs"->i_private From: Steven Rostedt To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Alexander Z Lam , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , David Sharp , Frederic Weisbecker , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Srikar Dronamraju , Vaibhav Nagarnaik , "zhangwei(Jovi)" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:59:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51F716AF.1040206@hitachi.com> References: <20130726172551.GA3632@redhat.com> <51F6392C.8000806@hitachi.com> <20130729142158.GA9338@redhat.com> <51F716AF.1040206@hitachi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1235 Lines: 35 On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 10:28 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > (2013/07/29 23:21), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 07/29, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> > >> (2013/07/27 2:25), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >>> Change remove_event_file_dir() to clear ->i_private for every > >>> file we are going to remove. > >> > >> Oleg, I think this should be done first. > >> > >> AFAICS, your former patches depend strongly on this change. > >> Without this, they don't work as you expected, and it may > >> prevent git-bisect. > > > > Why? > > > > v2 specially does this in the last change for bisecting/etc. > > > > 1-4 change f_op->read/write to check i_private != NULL but until > > this final patch i_private == NULL is not possible. > > Ah, OK. So 1-4 changes still remain refcount code, then > it is safe, just i_private != NULL are added. I misread. I just ran them all individually applied through my ftrace stress tests. All passed, thus they are as bisectible as I would like them to be. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/