Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758626Ab3GaANH (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:13:07 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:43785 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755837Ab3GaANF (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:13:05 -0400 Message-ID: <51F85690.9060701@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:13:04 -0700 From: Hanumant Singh User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Warren CC: Linus Walleij , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Bjorn Andersson , "Bird, Tim" , ext Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: msm: Add support for MSM TLMM pinmux References: <1374702089-2832-1-git-send-email-hanumant@codeaurora.org> <51F82BCC.1080409@codeaurora.org> <51F82E9F.9010309@wwwdotorg.org> <51F853BF.9040007@codeaurora.org> <51F8556A.1010300@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <51F8556A.1010300@wwwdotorg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2202 Lines: 51 On 7/30/2013 5:08 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 07/30/2013 06:01 PM, Hanumant Singh wrote: >> On 7/30/2013 2:22 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 07/30/2013 03:10 PM, hanumant wrote: >>> ... >>>> We actually have the same TLMM pinmux used by several socs of a family. >>>> The number of pins on each soc may vary. >>>> Also a given soc gets used in a number of boards. >>>> The device tree for a given soc is split into the different boards that >>>> its in ie the boards inherit a common soc.dtsi but have separate dts. >>>> The boards for the same soc may use different pin groups for >>>> accomplishing a function, since we have multiple i2c, spi uart etc >>>> peripheral instances on a soc. A different instance of each of the above >>>> peripherals, can be used in different boards, utilizing different >>>> or subset of same pin groups. >>>> Thus I would need to have multiple C files for one soc, based on the >>>> boards that it goes into. >>> >>> The pinctrl driver should be exposing the raw capabilities of the HW. >>> All the board-specific configuration should be expressed in DT. So, the >>> driver shouldn't have to know anything about different boards at >>> compile-time. >>> >> I agree, so I wanted to keep the pin grouping information in DT, we >> already have a board based differentiation of dts files in DT, for the >> same soc. > > That's the opposite of what I was saying. Pin groups are a feature of > the SoC design, not the board. > Sorry I guess I wasn't clear. Right now I have a soc-pinctrl.dtsi containing pin groupings. This will be "inherited" by soc-boardtype.dts. The pinctrl client device nodes in soc-boardtype.dts will point to pin groupings in soc-pinctrl.dtsi that are valid for that particular boardtype. Is this a valid design? Thanks Hanumant that are valid for that -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/