Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:47:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:47:47 -0400 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.7.65]:17680 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:47:46 -0400 Message-ID: <3DA7647C.3060603@namesys.com> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 03:53:32 +0400 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Landley CC: Linus Torvalds , "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)) References: <200210060130.g961UjY2206214@pimout2-ext.prodigy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 989 Lines: 25 Rob Landley wrote: >The new uncharted territory for Linux, and the next major order-of-magnitude >jump in the installed base, is the desktop. A kernel that could make a >credible stab at the desktop would certainly be 3.0 material. And the work >that matters for the desktop is LATENCY work. Not SMP, not throughput, not >more memory. Latency. O(1), deadline I/O scheduler, rmap, preempt, shorter >clock ticks, > > > I must confess to thinking that namespace work is the most strategic upcoming battle between Linux and Windows, but probably I am biased in this regard.;-) MS seems to think it also, given the rumors that OFS is where they are shifting their focus away from the browser and over to for Longhorn.... Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/