Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759693Ab3GaL7C (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:59:02 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:50008 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759458Ab3GaL67 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 07:58:59 -0400 Message-ID: <51F8FBEE.6060807@ti.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:58:38 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Huang CC: "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , "pawel.moll@arm.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" , "ian.campbell@citrix.com" , "rob@landley.net" , "lee.jones@linaro.org" , "broonie@linaro.org" , "j-keerthy@ti.com" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "ian@slimlogic.co.uk" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mallikarjun Kasoju Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: palmas: Add power off control References: <1375185957-28212-1-git-send-email-bilhuang@nvidia.com> <51F7BCEC.9080803@ti.com> <1375251767.32701.5.camel@bilhuang-vm1> In-Reply-To: <1375251767.32701.5.camel@bilhuang-vm1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-9"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1368 Lines: 32 On 07/31/2013 01:22 AM, Bill Huang wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 21:17 +0800, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On 07/30/2013 07:05 AM, Bill Huang wrote: [...] >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt >>> index 30b0581..4adca2a 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/palmas-pmic.txt >>> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ Optional nodes: >>> ti,smps-range - OTP has the wrong range set for the hardware so override >>> 0 - low range, 1 - high range. >>> >>> +- ti,system-power-controller: Telling whether or not this pmic is controlling >> controller or master? > > We name it controller since it controls the system power of the > platform, I'm not sure will it make more sense to be master? Or does it > makes sense to other pmic which also control the system power (the same > property are already used in pmic TPS6586x and TPS65910). No strong feelings either way, especially if there is precedence. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/