Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752447Ab3HACZl (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:25:41 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:56063 "EHLO mail-vb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751777Ab3HACZ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:25:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20130731221421.616d3d20@annuminas.surriel.com> References: <20130731174335.006a58f9@annuminas.surriel.com> <51F98CAB.80100@redhat.com> <51F99218.4060104@redhat.com> <51F999DE.7080200@redhat.com> <20130731221421.616d3d20@annuminas.surriel.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:25:27 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: m__fxnzEQfJl4p4KWjeDu1tkc7k Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] sched,x86: optimize switch_mm for multi-threaded workloads From: Linus Torvalds To: Rik van Riel Cc: Paul Turner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , jmario@redhat.com, Peter Anvin , dzickus@redhat.com, Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 670 Lines: 19 On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Rik van Riel wrote: > > Is this better? Not that I really care which version gets applied :) I'm ok with this. That said, I'm assuming this goes in through Ingo, since it is both x86 and scheduler-related. I can take it directly, but see no real reason to. Ingo? Talking about x86-specific - I'm assuming other architectures have similar patterns? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/