Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754114Ab3HADtb (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:49:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com ([209.85.192.172]:49474 "EHLO mail-pd0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753634Ab3HADta (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 23:49:30 -0400 Message-ID: <51F9DAC5.2000106@felipetonello.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 20:49:25 -0700 From: Felipe Ferreri Tonello User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Takashi Iwai CC: Mark Brown , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Henningsson , Wang Xingchao , Jaroslav Kysela Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ALSA: Added jack detection kcontrol support References: <1374863133-6745-1-git-send-email-eu@felipetonello.com> <1374863133-6745-2-git-send-email-eu@felipetonello.com> <20130726185458.GX9858@sirena.org.uk> <20130726224813.GB9858@sirena.org.uk> <20130727122524.GH9858@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1373 Lines: 36 Hi Takashi, On 07/29/2013 05:05 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Sat, 27 Jul 2013 13:25:24 +0100, > Mark Brown wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 04:13:40PM -0700, Felipe Tonello wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >> >>>>>> What I'd expect to happen here is that for multi function jacks we >>>>>> create a control per function if the controls are valid. >> >>> Ok, so the idea is just to change the control to type integer instead >>> of boolean, right? >>> Because as you say, the user will be able to check the type of jack >>> based on the status value, right? >> >> It might be more idiomatic and more compatible with userspace to create >> multiple controls for the jack, there was some discussion of this in the >> past I think but I can't remember the result. > > I also forget the end result :) > > Another option would be to make an enum control, but multiple boolean > controls are easier in the end. The headset controls of HD-audio are > represented in that way, too (because HD-audio specification can't > tell better). Yes. Thanks for the comment. Felipe Tonello -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/