Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753019Ab3HBE1k (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:27:40 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:56204 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853Ab3HBE1i (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:27:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 13:50:27 +1000 From: David Gibson To: "jonsmirl@gmail.com" Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Richard Cochran , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , Ian Campbell , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Tomasz Figa , "rob.herring@calxeda.com" , Domenico Andreoli , Jason Gunthorpe , Arend van Spriel , Mark Brown , Olof Johansson , mbizon@freebox.fr, Dave P Martin , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] Message-ID: <20130802035027.GA19115@voom.redhat.com> References: <20130725175702.GC22291@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <1999586.84BnWE5EUh@thinkpad> <20130731191209.GA8027@netboy> <1409617.9untvfnOTJ@flatron> <20130731200017.GC8027@netboy> <20130731201457.GA24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130731204817.GC24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1341 Lines: 42 --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 05:26:47PM -0400, jonsmirl@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:37:36PM -0400, jonsmirl@gmail.com > wrote: [snip] > Alternatively you may be of the belief that it is impossible to get > rid of the board specific code. But x86 doesn't have any of it, why > should ARM? Sure x86 has board specific code. It's just that x86 basically only has one board - PC. --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlH7LIMACgkQaILKxv3ab8aT3QCfZx5sxlhYiAf32+bRfDWGeNZK tiUAn2Xo/QTNCgRW0/LPk+bWYWBQpsPU =8Uwi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/