Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758038Ab3HBHx7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 03:53:59 -0400 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:36034 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757858Ab3HBHx6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 03:53:58 -0400 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 50.131.214.131 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18kjoQIUlTNFLJgo3leS9EX Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 00:53:53 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Greg KH Cc: ksummit-2013-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] [ARM ATTEND] kernel data bloat and how to avoid it Message-ID: <20130802075352.GY7656@atomide.com> References: <20130731073802.GT7656@atomide.com> <20130731123351.GA30474@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130731123351.GA30474@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1957 Lines: 48 * Greg KH [130731 05:39]: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:38:03AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Probably the biggest kernel data bloat issue is in the ARM land, but > > it also seems that it's becoming a Linux generic issue too, so I > > guess it could be discussed in either context. > > Why is it specific to ARM? What is so unique to ARM that causes it to > "bloat"? I think it has so far showed up on ARM because of no discoverable busses, but chances are it will be more of a generic problem. > And what exactly do you mean by "bloat"? Stuffing data to kernel that should not be in the kernel at all. Or if the data is needed by kernel, there should be only one set of the data defined rather than multiple copies of the data built into the kernel for each SoC or driver variant. > > Basically the data bloat issue is there for the arch code and drivers > > and may not show up initially until things have headed the wrong way for > > too long. > > What do you mean by this? You seem to be very vague here. People are unnecessarily defining registers in kernel for similar devices over and over again for each new SoC at the arch level and now more and more at the driver level. One example of that are device tree based drivers that don't describe the actual hardware, but instead have a binding that points to an index of defined registers in the driver. One way to avoid these kind of bloat issues is to allow drivers to load data at multiple points: Only abtolutely minimal set of data should be static, some should only come from the bootloader as a device tree or ACPI tables, and some is best to be loaded after booting from /lib/firmware. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/