Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 15:16:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 15:16:47 -0400 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:40114 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 15:16:46 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.42 From: Alan Cox To: Mark Peloquin Cc: hch@infradead.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 12 Oct 2002 20:34:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1034451245.15067.16.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 16 On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 18:14, Mark Peloquin wrote: > Should EVMS be included, the team will make it our top priority to resolve > the disputed design issues. If the ruling should be that some of our design > decisions must change, so be it, we will comply. Certainly some changes can > not be done by the 20th or 31st, however I feel the team can handle most > changes before 2.6 ships. Thats good to hear. Right now the debate appears to be - "users: please add EVMS" "hackers: oh my god no" - so you got the feature set right it seems - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/