Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755225Ab3HBRFe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 2 Aug 2013 13:05:34 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6144 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753066Ab3HBRFd (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 2 Aug 2013 13:05:33 -0400
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
	Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
	Kingdom.
	Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <87ob9hovop.fsf@xmission.com>
References: <87ob9hovop.fsf@xmission.com> <20130801173846.28023.19009.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20130801173902.28023.68819.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
        krbdev@mit.edu, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, simo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KEYS: Add per-user_namespace registers for persistent per-UID kerberos caches
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 18:05:26 +0100
Message-ID: <7289.1375463126@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1508
Lines: 43

Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:

> > The cache returned is a keyring named "_krb.<uid>" that the possessor can
> > read, search, clear, invalidate, unlink from and add links to.  SELinux
> > and co. get a say as to whether this call will succeed as the caller must
> > have LINK permission on the cache keyring.
> 
> I think it would be more accurate to say you use the existing LSM
> security hooks for security keys.

Yes.

> Calling out SELinux in particular just seems odd as there is absolutely
> nothing SELinux specific in this patch.

Sorry, I normally think of SELinux as that's what I usually deal with.  Yes,
any and all LSMs.

> > +		    !nsown_capable(CAP_SETUID))
>
> You you make this ns_capable(ns, CAP_SETUID);
> 
> nsown_capable is the right thing here but I am trying to remove the
> function because it makes it too easy to not think about which
> user namespace you are in.

Okay.

> > +	index_key.desc_len = sprintf(buf, "_krb.%u", __kuid_val(uid));
> 
> Please don't use the implementation detail __kuid_val.  Please use
> from_kuid(&init_user_ns, uid) instead so it is explicitly documented
> which user namespace you are using.

Actually, I don't want that either.  I want the user-visible UID from the
namespace.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/