Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:12:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:12:58 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-105.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105]:4481 "HELO ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:12:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20021012231841.8863.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 07:18:41 +0800 Subject: [Benchmark] Contest 0.51 X-Originating-Ip: 193.76.202.244 X-Originating-Server: ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3065 Lines: 80 Hi all, here the contest results: noload: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.19 [3] 128.8 97 0 0 1.01 2.5.40 [3] 134.4 96 0 0 1.05 2.5.40-nopree [3] 133.7 96 0 0 1.04 2.5.41 [3] 136.5 96 0 0 1.07 2.5.41-mm2 [3] 134.8 96 0 0 1.05 2.5.42 [3] 134.8 96 0 0 1.05 2.5.42-mm2 [3] 135.5 96 0 0 1.06 process_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.19 [3] 194.1 60 134 40 1.52 2.5.40 [3] 184.5 70 53 31 1.44 2.5.40-nopree [3] 286.4 45 163 55 2.24 2.5.41 [3] 192.6 68 59 32 1.50 2.5.41-mm2 [3] 193.4 66 68 34 1.51 2.5.42 [3] 187.6 68 58 32 1.46 2.5.42-mm2 [3] 186.0 69 60 31 1.45 io_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.19 [3] 461.0 28 46 8 3.60 2.5.40 [3] 293.6 45 25 8 2.29 2.5.40-nopree [3] 269.4 50 20 7 2.10 2.5.41 [3] 342.7 41 34 9 2.68 2.5.41-mm2 [3] 251.1 54 21 8 1.96 2.5.42 [3] 304.5 45 28 9 2.38 2.5.42-mm2 [3] 254.6 53 20 8 1.99 It seems useful to me add a colum with CPU%+LCPU%. It is intersting to notice that 2.5.41 spend 41+9=50% CPU time for compiling and for the io_load while 2.5.42 spend 45+9=54% time. Can I say that 2.5.42 is "better" than 2.5.41 ? read_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.42 [3] 162.3 82 10 4 1.27 2.5.42-mm2 [3] 162.5 82 10 4 1.27 No difference here. list_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.42 [3] 154.2 85 0 6 1.20 2.5.42-mm2 [3] 155.1 85 0 6 1.21 No difference here. mem_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.4.19 [3] 161.1 80 38 2 1.26 2.5.40 [3] 163.0 80 34 2 1.27 2.5.40-nopree [3] 161.7 80 34 2 1.26 2.5.41 [3] 161.0 83 33 2 1.26 2.5.41-mm2 [3] 229.9 57 35 1 1.80 2.5.42 [3] 157.9 83 33 2 1.23 2.5.42-mm2 [3] 162.2 81 33 2 1.27 No difference here. Comments ? Paolo -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/