Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755224Ab3HEIeo (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 04:34:44 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:60135 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754656Ab3HEIen (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 04:34:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 01:34:34 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@infradead.org, Andi Kleen , Namhyung Kim , peterz@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: perf, tools: Move gtk browser into separate perfgtk executable Message-ID: <20130805083434.GA20606@infradead.org> References: <1375669364-13838-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20130805081641.GA24808@gmail.com> <20130805082320.GA9562@infradead.org> <20130805083132.GE26746@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130805083132.GE26746@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1336 Lines: 28 On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:31:32AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Nonsense, a distro, if it truly worried about this, could create two > packages already, there's no need to expose configuration options in the > binary name itself and burden users with the separation. I sometimes > switch the UI frontend of perf depending on the workflow and the terminal, > it would be highly annoying if the binary name was changed to expose > configuration options. Which means you'd have to use a different tool name or have incompatible packages, both of which aren't desirable. > The thing is, you strongly objected to perf itself when we offered it up > for an upstream merge and I'm not surprised you still don't like it. I strongly objected to adding it to the kernel tree, and I still stand to that opinion because it makes using perf much more painful than it needs to be. I never disliked perf itself and use it frequently now that I can bypass some of the pains by just using an older distro package. But I'd much rather get this back to technical discussions than personal attacks.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/