Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:50:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:50:14 -0400 Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.93]:62732 "EHLO serenity.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:50:14 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 16:56:01 +0100 From: John Levon To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: jcdutton@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel api for application profiling Message-ID: <20021013155601.GB89058@compsoc.man.ac.uk> References: <200210131328.PAA14675@harpo.it.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200210131328.PAA14675@harpo.it.uu.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/ X-Record: Mr. Scruff - Trouser Jazz Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 856 Lines: 24 On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 03:28:44PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > And before people ask me: perfctr is not yet in official kernels, > I'm working on a cleaned up version for 2.5 submission RSN, This is going to clash head-on with oprofile. However, the two systems are both useful in their own rights: oprofile isn't useful for interstitial timings as described above, whereas perfctr isn't really designed for system profiling. So I suspect the simplest solution would be to make the config options for them exclusive. Comments ? regards john -- "That's just kitten-eating wrong." - Richard Henderson - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/