Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:25:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:25:56 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:40822 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 12:25:56 -0400 To: Alan Cox Cc: Alexander Kellett , jw schultz , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: The end of embedded Linux? References: <3DA1CF36.19659.13D4209@localhost> <3DA2BD70.14919.2C6951@localhost> <20021008112719.GC6537@pegasys.ws> <20021009073725.GA22778@groucho.verza.com> <1034164188.1253.5.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 13 Oct 2002 10:30:16 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1034164188.1253.5.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 976 Lines: 20 Alan Cox writes: > On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 08:37, Alexander Kellett wrote: > > This talk of adeos reminds me of something that i'd > > "dreamed" of a while back. Whats the feasability of > > having a 70kb kernel that barely even provides support > > for user space apps and is basically just an hardware > > abstraction layer for "applications" that can be > > written as kernel modules? > > Its called FreeDOS, A 70KB kernel without device drivers, or anything much compiled in is a reasonable target. The whole "applications as modules" thing is an entirely different animal. The initial complaint about the size growth of the Anything is better that 200+KB compressed as a minimal size. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/