Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261574AbSJMSUB>; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:20:01 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261575AbSJMSUB>; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:20:01 -0400
Received: from opengfs.tovarcom.com ([65.67.58.21]:15799 "HELO
	escalade.vistahp.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S261574AbSJMST7>; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:19:59 -0400
Message-ID: <20021013183415.30085.qmail@escalade.vistahp.com>
References: <F87rkrlMjzmfv2NkkSD000144a9@hotmail.com>
            <3DA969F0.1060109@metaparadigm.com>
            <20021013144926.B16668@infradead.org>
            <3DA98E48.9000001@metaparadigm.com>
            <20021013163551.A18184@infradead.org>
            <20021013161151.29293.qmail@escalade.vistahp.com>
            <1034531191.6032.4498.camel@phantasy>
In-Reply-To: <1034531191.6032.4498.camel@phantasy> 
From: "Brian Jackson" <brian-kernel-list@mdrx.com>
To: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, evms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.42
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:34:15 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1643
Lines: 41

Robert Love writes: 

> On Sun, 2002-10-13 at 12:11, Brian Jackson wrote: 
> 
>> Good for you. Most people can't/won't wait for it. They will see that
>> linux  doesn't have a key feature for enterprises, and say that linux
>> still isn't mature enough for them and at best only use linux on some
>> dinky little webservers, like it has been used in the past. There
>> isn't a whole lot of that market left. If we want to move forward and
>> offer something to a broader base of companies, we need features like
>> this included. 
> 
> s/Most people/Most enterprise people/ 
> 
> And this is really entirely the wrong attitude to take.  "Linux does not
> have volume management" and "High-end Linux applications need volume
> management" do not logically imply "we need to merge EVMS." 
> 
> You need to fix the issues Christoph and others raised and you need to
> work within the system.  I won't cry if EVMS is not merged. 
> 

Just for clarification I have nothing to do with EVMS, other than I think it 
would be a good addition. I don't want anybody to get the idea that they are 
as unprofessional as me. 

 --Brian 

> 	Robert Love 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/