Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:55:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:55:16 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:12036 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 14:55:16 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 20:01:04 +0100 From: Russell King To: Wim Van Sebroeck , Rob Radez Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Watchdog drivers Message-ID: <20021013200104.C23142@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20021013194041.A15609@medelec.uia.ac.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20021013194041.A15609@medelec.uia.ac.be>; from wim@iguana.be on Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:40:41PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 22 On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:40:41PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > I'm reviewing the different watchdog drivers and started porting the features > that have been added in the 2.4 kernel to the 2.5 development kernel. > I now wondered if it would make sence to put all watchdog drivers in > drivers/char/watchdog/ instead of in drivers/char ? > Please comments. Rob Radez has been doing a lot of work in this area; I thought he was going to do the 2.5 drivers as well (or his last mail on the 8 August seemed to imply that.) Not sure what happened. Rob? -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/