Message-ID: <1375808178.10300.181.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI, cpu hotplug: move try_offline_node() after
 acpi_unmap_lsapic()
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 10:56:18 -0600
In-Reply-To: <5200CBBF.1090904@jp.fujitsu.com>
References: <5200CBBF.1090904@jp.fujitsu.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1138
Lines: 29

On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
> removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
> been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
> 
> But try_offline_node() called from acpi_processor_remove() never clears
> the node information. For disabling cpu_present_bits, acpi_unmap_lsapic()
> need be called. But acpi_unmap_lsapic() is called after try_offline_node()
> runs. So when try_offline_node() runs, the cpu's cpu_present_bits is always
> set.
> 
> This patch moves try_offline_node() after acpi_unmap_lsapic().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>

The change looks good to me.

Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>

BTW, do you know why try_offline_node() has to use stop_machine()?

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/