Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:44:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:44:21 -0400 Received: from coffee.Psychology.McMaster.CA ([130.113.218.59]:31631 "EHLO coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:44:21 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:58:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Hahn X-X-Sender: To: Brian Jackson cc: , Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.42 In-Reply-To: <20021013170630.29597.qmail@escalade.vistahp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1211 Lines: 24 > Yes I do realize that, but I think EVMS offers more in the long run than any > of the others. not to put too find a point on it, but IBM has their own goals. for instance, some part of EVMS design is motivated by IBM's political desire to permit its bank customers, who have horrible old OS/2 systems, to transparently use OS/2 volumes. it's not as if IBM couldn't provide a simple, user-level migration tool. it's not as if the Linux community is going to rush out and say "let's all start use OS/2 volumes everywhere!" using Linux to make your customers happy is great; the issue is whether it deforms Linux in general to be shaped by non-shared priorities. yes, I'm a crank, and yes, I'm bothered by other IBM influences, such as their fixation with performance of broken platforms like Profusion, or tuning for NUMA. the best part of Linux is its willingness to throw out old designs; a big system like EVMS has its own resistance to such redesign. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/