Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756072Ab3HFUzm (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:55:42 -0400 Received: from va3ehsobe010.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.30]:15036 "EHLO va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753315Ab3HFUzk (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2013 16:55:40 -0400 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:163.181.249.108;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:ausb3twp01.amd.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -1 X-BigFish: VPS-1(zzbb2dI98dI9371I1102I1432I4015Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz1de098h8275bh1de097hz2dh668h839h93fhd25he5bhf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h1765h18e1h190ch1946h19b4h19c3h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1f5fh783m1155h) X-WSS-ID: 0MR4NGJ-01-98H-02 X-M-MSG: Message-ID: <520162C1.2080603@amd.com> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:55:29 -0500 From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 V2] EDAC, AMD64_EDAC: Add ECC decoding support for newer F15h models. References: <1375483384-2302-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com> <1375483384-2302-4-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com> <20130806202323.GH14891@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20130806202323.GH14891@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [163.181.55.254] X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn% Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 21009 Lines: 651 On 8/6/2013 3:23 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 05:43:04PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote: >> Adding support for handling ECC error decoding for new F15 models. >> On newer models, support has been included for upto 4 DCT's, >> however, only DCT0 and DCT3 are currently configured. (Refer BKDG Section 2.10) >> There is also a new "Routing DRAM Requests" algorithm for this model. >> >> Tested on Fam15h M30h with ECC turned on using mce_amd_inj facility and >> verified to be functionally correct. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan >> >> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c >> index 8b6a034..42dab12 100644 >> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c >> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c >> @@ -123,7 +123,11 @@ static void f15h_select_dct(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct) >> u32 reg = 0; >> >> amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DCT_CFG_SEL, ®); >> - reg &= 0xfffffffe; >> + /* >> + * If Fam15h M30h, mask out last two bits for programming dct. >> + * Else, only mask out the last bit. >> + */ > No need for that comment. > >> + reg &= (F15_M30H_CPUS) ? 0xfffffffc : 0xfffffff8; > Let's see, I had 0xfffffffe and now you have 0xfffffff8. See the > difference? > > Also, F15H_M30H_CPUS is an enum, AFAICT, and it will always be true as > long as it is != 0. What you meant here is "F15H_M30H_CPU". So you see > how those defines are misleading and made you use them wrong. > > So let's correct it all and make it more clear: > > reg &= (pvt->model >= 0x30) ? ~3 : ~1; > > we don't need to look at the family because this function - > f15h_select_dct - is called on F15h only anyway. Oops.. My bad. Will fix this. >> reg |= dct; >> amd64_write_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DCT_CFG_SEL, reg); >> } >> @@ -133,8 +137,12 @@ static int f15_read_dct_pci_cfg(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, int addr, u32 *val, >> { >> u8 dct = 0; >> >> + /* >> + * For F15 M30h, the second dct is DCT 3. >> + * Refer BKDG Section 2.10 >> + */ >> if (addr >= 0x140 && addr <= 0x1a0) { >> - dct = 1; >> + dct = F15H_M30H_CPU ? 3 : 1; > ditto here: use pvt->model like above. Okay. >> addr -= 0x100; >> } >> >> @@ -205,8 +213,9 @@ static int amd64_set_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u32 bw) >> if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0xf) >> min_scrubrate = 0x0; >> >> - /* F15h Erratum #505 */ >> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15) >> + /* F15h Models 0x00 - 0x0f Erratum #505 */ > Hmm, are you sure this erratum is fixed in SR? Talk to Eric about it > first, please. RG says "No fix planned". > >> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && >> + boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x30) >> f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0); >> >> return __amd64_set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate); >> @@ -218,8 +227,9 @@ static int amd64_get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) >> u32 scrubval = 0; >> int i, retval = -EINVAL; >> >> - /* F15h Erratum #505 */ >> - if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15) >> + /* F15h Models 0x00 - 0x0f Erratum #505 */ > ditto. I have pinged some people about it, will let you know.. >> + if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 && >> + boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x30) >> f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0); >> >> amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval); >> @@ -343,10 +353,10 @@ static void get_cs_base_and_mask(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, int csrow, u8 dct, >> addr_shift = 4; >> >> /* >> - * F16h needs two addr_shift values: 8 for high and 6 for low >> - * (cf. F16h BKDG). >> + * F16h and F15h(model 30h) needs two addr_shift values: >> + * 8 for high and 6 for low (cf. F16h BKDG). >> */ >> - } else if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x16) { >> + } else if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x16 || F15H_M30H_CPU) { > pvt->family and ->model please. This macro is ugly and confusing. > >> csbase = pvt->csels[dct].csbases[csrow]; >> csmask = pvt->csels[dct].csmasks[csrow >> 1]; >> >> @@ -743,6 +753,9 @@ static void prep_chip_selects(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) >> if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0xf && pvt->ext_model < K8_REV_F) { >> pvt->csels[0].b_cnt = pvt->csels[1].b_cnt = 8; >> pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 8; >> + } else if (F15H_M30H_CPU) { >> + pvt->csels[0].b_cnt = pvt->csels[1].b_cnt = 4; >> + pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 2; >> } else { >> pvt->csels[0].b_cnt = pvt->csels[1].b_cnt = 8; >> pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 4; >> @@ -850,9 +863,9 @@ static u64 get_error_address(struct mce *m) >> addr = m->addr & GENMASK(start_bit, end_bit); >> >> /* >> - * Erratum 637 workaround >> + * Erratum 637 workaround for F15h Models 0x00 - 0x0f > Same here - RG says this erratum is, like 505, "No fix planned" > >> */ >> - if (c->x86 == 0x15) { >> + if (c->x86 == 0x15 && c->x86_model != 0x30) { >> struct amd64_pvt *pvt; >> u64 cc6_base, tmp_addr; >> u32 tmp; >> @@ -918,6 +931,7 @@ static void read_dram_base_limit_regs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range) >> struct amd_northbridge *nb; >> struct pci_dev *misc, *f1 = NULL; >> struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data; >> + unsigned int pci_func; >> int off = range << 3; >> u32 llim; >> >> @@ -942,7 +956,12 @@ static void read_dram_base_limit_regs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range) >> return; >> >> misc = nb->misc; >> - f1 = pci_get_related_function(misc->vendor, PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F1, misc); >> + >> + pci_func = (c->x86_model == 0x30) ? PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1 >> + : PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1; > Something's wrong with this line :-) Oh no! (vim auto-complete! :( ) Will fix this. >> + >> + f1 = pci_get_related_function(misc->vendor, pci_func, misc); >> + >> if (WARN_ON(!f1)) >> return; >> >> @@ -1173,7 +1192,8 @@ static int f15_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct, >> } >> >> /* >> - * F16h has only limited cs_modes >> + * F16h has only limited cs_modes. >> + * F15 M30h follows the same pattern. >> */ >> static int f16_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct, >> unsigned cs_mode) >> @@ -1218,6 +1238,51 @@ static void read_dram_ctl_register(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) >> } >> >> /* >> + * Determine channel (DCT) based on the interleaving mode: >> + * F15h M30h BKDG, 2.10.12 Memory Interleaving Modes. >> + */ >> +static u8 f15_m30h_determine_channel(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u64 sys_addr, >> + u8 intlv_en, int num_dcts_intlv, u32 dct_sel) > Arg indentation. Sorry, will fix. >> +{ >> + u8 channel = 0; >> + u8 select; >> + u8 intlv_addr = dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt); >> + >> + if (!(intlv_en)) >> + return (u8)(dct_sel); >> + /* >> + * If num_dcts_intlv == 2, them consider addr bit 8 or addr bit 9 >> + * depending on intlv_addr, then return either channel = 0/1/2/3. >> + * If num_dcts_intlv == 4, consider either bits[8:9] or bits[9:10] >> + * depending on intlv_addr, then return the value obtained. > No need for that comment. > >> + */ >> + >> + if (num_dcts_intlv == 2) { >> + if (intlv_addr == 0x4) >> + select = (sys_addr >> 8) & BIT(0); >> + else if (intlv_addr == 0x5) >> + select = (sys_addr >> 9) & BIT(0); > So, basically you can take care of the two cases together by doing: > > select = (sys_addr >> 8) & 0x3; > > ? > >> + else >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* If select !=0, upper DCT selected, else lower DCT */ > I think we can see that, no need for the comment. > >> + channel = select ? 0x3 : 0; >> + >> + } else if (num_dcts_intlv == 4) { >> + if (intlv_addr == 0x4) >> + select = (sys_addr >> 8) & 0x3; >> + else if (intlv_addr == 0x5) >> + select = (sys_addr >> 9) & 0x3; > Ditto here, as above. > >> + else >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + channel = select; >> + } >> + >> + return channel; >> +} >> + >> +/* >> * Determine channel (DCT) based on the interleaving mode: F10h BKDG, 2.8.9 Memory >> * Interleaving Modes. >> */ >> @@ -1366,6 +1431,10 @@ static int f1x_lookup_addr_in_dct(u64 in_addr, u8 nid, u8 dct) >> (in_addr & cs_mask), (cs_base & cs_mask)); >> >> if ((in_addr & cs_mask) == (cs_base & cs_mask)) { >> + if (F15H_M30H_CPU) { >> + cs_found = csrow; >> + break; >> + } >> cs_found = f10_process_possible_spare(pvt, dct, csrow); >> >> edac_dbg(1, " MATCH csrow=%d\n", cs_found); >> @@ -1492,20 +1561,151 @@ static int f1x_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range, >> return cs_found; >> } >> >> -static int f1x_translate_sysaddr_to_cs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u64 sys_addr, >> - int *chan_sel) >> +/* >> + * Routing DRAM Requests algorithm is different for F15h M30h. >> + * It is cleaner to use a brand new function rather than >> + * adding quirks in the more generic 'f1x_match_to_this_node'. >> + * Refer "2.10.5 DRAM Routing Requests" in BKDG for info. >> + */ > This comment belongs in the commit message of this patch. Okay. >> +static int f15_m30h_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range, >> + u64 sys_addr, int *chan_sel) > Arg indentation Sorry, will fix.. >> +{ >> + int cs_found = -EINVAL; >> + int num_dcts_intlv = 0; >> + u64 chan_addr, chan_offset, high_addr_offset; >> + u64 dct_base, dct_limit; >> + u32 dct_cont_base_reg, dct_cont_limit_reg, tmp; >> + u8 channel, alias_channel, leg_mmio_hole; >> + >> + >> + /* Read DRAM Control registers specific to F15 M30h. */ > No need for the comment. > >> + amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_BASE, &dct_cont_base_reg); >> + amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_LIMIT, &dct_cont_limit_reg); >> + >> + /* Extract F15h M30h specific config */ > No need for the comment. > >> + u64 dhar_offset = f10_dhar_offset(pvt); >> + u8 dct_offset_en = (u8) ((dct_cont_base_reg >> 3) & BIT(0)); >> + u8 dct_sel = (u8) ((dct_cont_base_reg >> 4) & 0x7); >> + u8 intlv_addr = dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt); >> + u8 node_id = dram_dst_node(pvt, range); >> + u8 intlv_en = dram_intlv_en(pvt, range); >> + >> + edac_dbg(1, "(range %d) SystemAddr= 0x%llx Limit=0x%llx\n", >> + range, sys_addr, get_dram_limit(pvt, range)); >> + >> + if (!(get_dram_base(pvt, range) <= sys_addr) && >> + !(get_dram_limit(pvt, range) >= sys_addr)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + if (dhar_valid(pvt) && >> + dhar_base(pvt) <= sys_addr && >> + sys_addr < BIT_64(32)) { >> + amd64_warn("Huh? Address is in the MMIO hole: 0x%016llx\n", >> + sys_addr); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* Verify sys_addr is within DCT Range. */ >> + dct_base = (dct_sel_baseaddr(pvt) << 27); >> + dct_limit = (((dct_cont_limit_reg >> 11) & 0x1FFF) << 27) | 0x7FFFFFF; >> + if (!(dct_cont_base_reg & BIT(0)) && >> + !(dct_base <= sys_addr && dct_limit >= sys_addr)) { >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* Verify number of dct's that participate in channel interleaving. */ >> + num_dcts_intlv = (int) hweight8(intlv_en); >> + >> + if (!(num_dcts_intlv % 2 == 0) || (num_dcts_intlv > 4)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + channel = f15_m30h_determine_channel(pvt, sys_addr, intlv_en, >> + num_dcts_intlv, dct_sel); >> + >> + /* Verify if we stay within the MAX number of channels allowed */ > s/if// > >> + if (channel > 4 || channel < 0) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + leg_mmio_hole = (u8) (dct_cont_base_reg >> 1 & BIT(0)); >> + >> + /* Get normalized DCT addr */ >> + if (leg_mmio_hole && (sys_addr >= BIT_64(32))) >> + chan_offset = dhar_offset; >> + else >> + chan_offset = dct_base; >> + >> + chan_addr = sys_addr - chan_offset; >> + >> + /* remove channel interleave */ >> + if (num_dcts_intlv == 2) { >> + if (intlv_addr == 0x4) >> + chan_addr = ((chan_addr >> 9) << 8) | >> + (chan_addr & 0xff); >> + else if (intlv_addr == 0x5) >> + chan_addr = ((chan_addr >> 10) << 9) | >> + (chan_addr & 0x1ff); >> + else >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + } else if (num_dcts_intlv == 4) { >> + if (intlv_addr == 0x4) >> + chan_addr = ((chan_addr >> 10) << 8) | >> + (chan_addr & 0xff); >> + else if (intlv_addr == 0x5) >> + chan_addr = ((chan_addr >> 11) << 9) | >> + (chan_addr & 0x1ff); >> + else >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + if (dct_offset_en) { >> + amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, >> + DRAM_CONT_HIGH_OFF + (int) channel * 4, >> + &tmp); >> + chan_addr += ((tmp >> 11) & 0xfff) << 27; >> + } >> + >> + /* Set DCTCFGSEL = ChannelSelect */ > No need for the comment. > >> + f15h_select_dct(pvt, channel); >> + >> + edac_dbg(1, " Normalized DCT addr: 0x%llx\n", chan_addr); >> + /* Find the Chip select.. */ >> + /* >> + * NOTE: if channel = 3, then alias it to 1. >> + * This is because, in F15 M30h, there is support for >> + * 4 DCT's, but only 2 are currently included in the architecture. >> + * They are DCT0 and DCT3. But we have read all registers of DCT3 >> + * into pvt->csels[1]. So we need to use '1' here to get correct >> + * info. Refer F15 M30h BKDG Section 2.10 and 2.10.3 for clarifications >> + */ > Comment needs block formatting. Okay. >> + >> + alias_channel = (channel == 3) ? 1 : channel; >> + >> + cs_found = f1x_lookup_addr_in_dct(chan_addr, node_id, alias_channel); >> + >> + if (cs_found >= 0) >> + *chan_sel = alias_channel; >> + >> + return cs_found; >> +} >> + >> +static int >> +f1x_translate_sysaddr_to_cs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, >> + u64 sys_addr, >> + int *chan_sel) >> { > Arg indentation. > >> int cs_found = -EINVAL; >> unsigned range; >> >> for (range = 0; range < DRAM_RANGES; range++) { >> - >> if (!dram_rw(pvt, range)) >> continue; >> - >> - if ((get_dram_base(pvt, range) <= sys_addr) && >> - (get_dram_limit(pvt, range) >= sys_addr)) { >> - >> + if (F15H_M30H_CPU) >> + cs_found = f15_m30h_match_to_this_node(pvt, range, >> + sys_addr, >> + chan_sel); >> + else if ((get_dram_base(pvt, range) <= sys_addr) && >> + (get_dram_limit(pvt, range) >= sys_addr)) { >> cs_found = f1x_match_to_this_node(pvt, range, >> sys_addr, chan_sel); >> if (cs_found >= 0) >> @@ -1624,6 +1824,17 @@ static struct amd64_family_type amd64_family_types[] = { >> .read_dct_pci_cfg = f15_read_dct_pci_cfg, >> } >> }, >> + [F15_M30H_CPUS] = { >> + .ctl_name = "F15h_M30h", >> + .f1_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1, >> + .f3_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F3, >> + .ops = { >> + .early_channel_count = f1x_early_channel_count, >> + .map_sysaddr_to_csrow = f1x_map_sysaddr_to_csrow, >> + .dbam_to_cs = f16_dbam_to_chip_select, >> + .read_dct_pci_cfg = f15_read_dct_pci_cfg, >> + } >> + }, >> [F16_CPUS] = { >> .ctl_name = "F16h", >> .f1_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_NB_F1, >> @@ -2388,27 +2599,44 @@ static void setup_mci_misc_attrs(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, >> static struct amd64_family_type *amd64_per_family_init(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) >> { >> u8 fam = boot_cpu_data.x86; >> + u8 model = boot_cpu_data.x86_model; >> struct amd64_family_type *fam_type = NULL; >> >> switch (fam) { >> case 0xf: >> fam_type = &amd64_family_types[K8_CPUS]; >> pvt->ops = &amd64_family_types[K8_CPUS].ops; >> + pvt->family = fam; > You could call it pvt->fam for less typing if you like. Sure!, and I will take it outside the switch as suggested below. >> + pvt->model = model; >> break; >> >> case 0x10: >> fam_type = &amd64_family_types[F10_CPUS]; >> pvt->ops = &amd64_family_types[F10_CPUS].ops; >> + pvt->family = fam; >> + pvt->model = model; >> break; >> >> case 0x15: >> + if (model == 0x30) { >> + fam_type = &amd64_family_types[F15_M30H_CPUS]; >> + pvt->ops = &amd64_family_types[F15_M30H_CPUS].ops; >> + pvt->family = fam; >> + pvt->model = model; >> + break; >> + } >> + >> fam_type = &amd64_family_types[F15_CPUS]; >> pvt->ops = &amd64_family_types[F15_CPUS].ops; >> + pvt->family = fam; >> + pvt->model = model; >> break; >> >> case 0x16: >> fam_type = &amd64_family_types[F16_CPUS]; >> pvt->ops = &amd64_family_types[F16_CPUS].ops; >> + pvt->family = fam; >> + pvt->model = model; > This ->family and ->model assignment is repeated in every case. What > do you think, could it probably be done only once, outside the switch > statement? > >> break; >> >> default: >> @@ -2638,6 +2866,14 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(amd64_pci_table) = { >> }, >> { >> .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, >> + .device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F2, >> + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, >> + .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID, >> + .class = 0, >> + .class_mask = 0, >> + }, >> + { >> + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, >> .device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_NB_F2, >> .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, >> .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID, >> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h >> index 2c6f113..ff15f14 100644 >> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h >> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h >> @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ >> /* >> * PCI-defined configuration space registers >> */ >> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1 0x141b >> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F2 0x141c >> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F1 0x1601 >> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F2 0x1602 >> #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_NB_F1 0x1531 >> @@ -181,13 +183,24 @@ >> #define DRAM_BASE_LO 0x40 >> #define DRAM_LIMIT_LO 0x44 >> >> -#define dram_intlv_en(pvt, i) ((u8)((pvt->ranges[i].base.lo >> 8) & 0x7)) >> +/* >> + * F15 M30h DRAM Controller Base/Limit >> + * D18F1x2[1C:00] >> + */ >> +#define DRAM_CONT_BASE 0x200 >> +#define DRAM_CONT_LIMIT 0x204 >> + >> +/* >> + * F15 M30h DRAM Controller High Addre Offset >> + * D18F1x2[4C:40] >> + */ >> +#define DRAM_CONT_HIGH_OFF 0x240 >> + >> #define dram_rw(pvt, i) ((u8)(pvt->ranges[i].base.lo & 0x3)) >> #define dram_intlv_sel(pvt, i) ((u8)((pvt->ranges[i].lim.lo >> 8) & 0x7)) >> #define dram_dst_node(pvt, i) ((u8)(pvt->ranges[i].lim.lo & 0x7)) >> >> #define DHAR 0xf0 >> -#define dhar_valid(pvt) ((pvt)->dhar & BIT(0)) >> #define dhar_mem_hoist_valid(pvt) ((pvt)->dhar & BIT(1)) >> #define dhar_base(pvt) ((pvt)->dhar & 0xff000000) >> #define k8_dhar_offset(pvt) (((pvt)->dhar & 0x0000ff00) << 16) >> @@ -234,8 +247,6 @@ >> #define DDR3_MODE BIT(8) >> >> #define DCT_SEL_LO 0x110 >> -#define dct_sel_baseaddr(pvt) ((pvt)->dct_sel_lo & 0xFFFFF800) >> -#define dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt) (((pvt)->dct_sel_lo >> 6) & 0x3) >> #define dct_high_range_enabled(pvt) ((pvt)->dct_sel_lo & BIT(0)) >> #define dct_interleave_enabled(pvt) ((pvt)->dct_sel_lo & BIT(2)) >> >> @@ -293,10 +304,14 @@ >> /* MSRs */ >> #define MSR_MCGCTL_NBE BIT(4) >> >> +/* Helper Macro for F15h M30h */ >> +#define F15H_M30H_CPU ((pvt->family == 0x15) && \ >> + (pvt->model == 0x30)) > Please drop this macro - the condition is not that complicated to write > out and not error prone. Okay. >> enum amd_families { >> K8_CPUS = 0, >> F10_CPUS, >> F15_CPUS, >> + F15_M30H_CPUS, >> F16_CPUS, >> NUM_FAMILIES, >> }; >> @@ -337,6 +352,8 @@ struct amd64_pvt { >> struct pci_dev *F1, *F2, *F3; >> >> u16 mc_node_id; /* MC index of this MC node */ >> + u8 family; /* CPU family */ >> + u8 model; /* CPU model */ >> int ext_model; /* extended model value of this node */ >> int channel_count; >> >> @@ -414,6 +431,14 @@ static inline u16 extract_syndrome(u64 status) >> return ((status >> 47) & 0xff) | ((status >> 16) & 0xff00); >> } >> >> +static inline u8 dct_sel_interleave_addr(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) >> +{ >> + if (F15H_M30H_CPU) >> + return (((pvt->dct_sel_hi >> 9) & 0x1) << 2) | >> + ((pvt->dct_sel_lo >> 6) & 0x3); >> + >> + return ((pvt)->dct_sel_lo >> 6) & 0x3; >> +} >> /* >> * per-node ECC settings descriptor >> */ >> @@ -504,3 +529,33 @@ static inline void enable_caches(void *dummy) >> { >> write_cr0(read_cr0() & ~X86_CR0_CD); >> } >> + >> +static inline u8 dram_intlv_en(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned int i) >> +{ >> + u32 tmp; >> + if (F15H_M30H_CPU) { > u32 tmp inside the if-statement. > >> + amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_LIMIT, &tmp); >> + return (u8) tmp & 0xF; >> + } >> + return (u8) (pvt->ranges[i].base.lo >> 8) & 0x7; >> +} >> + >> +static inline u8 dhar_valid(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) >> +{ >> + u32 tmp; >> + if (F15H_M30H_CPU) { > ditto. > >> + amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_BASE, &tmp); >> + return (tmp >> 1) & BIT(0); >> + } >> + return (pvt)->dhar & BIT(0); >> +} >> + >> +static inline u32 dct_sel_baseaddr(struct amd64_pvt *pvt) >> +{ >> + u32 tmp; >> + if (F15H_M30H_CPU) { > ditto. > >> + amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_BASE, &tmp); >> + return (tmp >> 11) & 0x1FFF; >> + } >> + return (pvt)->dct_sel_lo & 0xFFFFF800; >> +} will send out changes in V3; Thanks, Aravind. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/