Message-ID: <52017213.4000704@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 17:00:51 -0500
From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
CC: <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
        <dougthompson@xmission.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        <jbeulich@suse.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 V2] EDAC, AMD64_EDAC: Add ECC decoding support for
 newer F15h models.
References: <1375483384-2302-1-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com> <1375483384-2302-4-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com> <20130806202323.GH14891@pd.tnic> <520162C1.2080603@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <520162C1.2080603@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 24042
Lines: 657

On 8/6/2013 3:55 PM, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> On 8/6/2013 3:23 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 05:43:04PM -0500, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
>>> Adding support for handling ECC error decoding for new F15 models.
>>> On newer models, support has been included for upto 4 DCT's,
>>> however, only DCT0 and DCT3 are currently configured. (Refer BKDG 
>>> Section 2.10)
>>> There is also a new "Routing DRAM Requests" algorithm for this model.
>>>
>>> Tested on Fam15h M30h with ECC turned on using mce_amd_inj facility and
>>> verified to be functionally correct.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>>> index 8b6a034..42dab12 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
>>> @@ -123,7 +123,11 @@ static void f15h_select_dct(struct amd64_pvt 
>>> *pvt, u8 dct)
>>>       u32 reg = 0;
>>>         amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DCT_CFG_SEL, &reg);
>>> -    reg &= 0xfffffffe;
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * If Fam15h M30h, mask out last two bits for programming dct.
>>> +     * Else, only mask out the last bit.
>>> +     */
>> No need for that comment.
>>
>>> +    reg &= (F15_M30H_CPUS) ? 0xfffffffc : 0xfffffff8;
>> Let's see, I had 0xfffffffe and now you have 0xfffffff8. See the
>> difference?
>>
>> Also, F15H_M30H_CPUS is an enum, AFAICT, and it will always be true as
>> long as it is != 0. What you meant here is "F15H_M30H_CPU". So you see
>> how those defines are misleading and made you use them wrong.
>>
>> So let's correct it all and make it more clear:
>>
>>     reg &= (pvt->model >= 0x30) ? ~3 : ~1;
>>
>> we don't need to look at the family because this function -
>> f15h_select_dct - is called on F15h only anyway.
> Oops.. My bad. Will fix this.
>
>>>       reg |= dct;
>>>       amd64_write_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DCT_CFG_SEL, reg);
>>>   }
>>> @@ -133,8 +137,12 @@ static int f15_read_dct_pci_cfg(struct 
>>> amd64_pvt *pvt, int addr, u32 *val,
>>>   {
>>>       u8 dct  = 0;
>>>   +    /*
>>> +     * For F15 M30h, the second dct is DCT 3.
>>> +     * Refer BKDG Section 2.10
>>> +     */
>>>       if (addr >= 0x140 && addr <= 0x1a0) {
>>> -        dct   = 1;
>>> +        dct = F15H_M30H_CPU ? 3 : 1;
>> ditto here: use pvt->model like above.
> Okay.
>
>>>           addr -= 0x100;
>>>       }
>>>   @@ -205,8 +213,9 @@ static int amd64_set_scrub_rate(struct 
>>> mem_ctl_info *mci, u32 bw)
>>>       if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0xf)
>>>           min_scrubrate = 0x0;
>>>   -    /* F15h Erratum #505 */
>>> -    if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15)
>>> +    /* F15h Models 0x00 - 0x0f Erratum #505 */
>> Hmm, are you sure this erratum is fixed in SR? Talk to Eric about it
>> first, please. RG says "No fix planned".
>>
>>> +    if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 &&
>>> +        boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x30)
>>>           f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
>>>         return __amd64_set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate);
>>> @@ -218,8 +227,9 @@ static int amd64_get_scrub_rate(struct 
>>> mem_ctl_info *mci)
>>>       u32 scrubval = 0;
>>>       int i, retval = -EINVAL;
>>>   -    /* F15h Erratum #505 */
>>> -    if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15)
>>> +    /* F15h Models 0x00 - 0x0f Erratum #505 */
>> ditto.
>
> I have pinged some people about it, will let you know..
>
>>> +    if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x15 &&
>>> +        boot_cpu_data.x86_model != 0x30)
>>>           f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
>>>         amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
>>> @@ -343,10 +353,10 @@ static void get_cs_base_and_mask(struct 
>>> amd64_pvt *pvt, int csrow, u8 dct,
>>>           addr_shift    = 4;
>>>         /*
>>> -    * F16h needs two addr_shift values: 8 for high and 6 for low
>>> -    * (cf. F16h BKDG).
>>> +    * F16h and F15h(model 30h) needs two addr_shift values:
>>> +    * 8 for high and 6 for low (cf. F16h BKDG).
>>>       */
>>> -    } else if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x16) {
>>> +    } else if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x16 || F15H_M30H_CPU) {
>> pvt->family and ->model please. This macro is ugly and confusing.
>>

Quick question:
Shall I change all instances of boot_cpu_data.[x86|x86_model] to use 
pvt->fam and pvt->model
wherever applicable as part of this patch or have it go in as a separate 
patch?

>>>           csbase          = pvt->csels[dct].csbases[csrow];
>>>           csmask          = pvt->csels[dct].csmasks[csrow >> 1];
>>>   @@ -743,6 +753,9 @@ static void prep_chip_selects(struct amd64_pvt 
>>> *pvt)
>>>       if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0xf && pvt->ext_model < K8_REV_F) {
>>>           pvt->csels[0].b_cnt = pvt->csels[1].b_cnt = 8;
>>>           pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 8;
>>> +    } else if (F15H_M30H_CPU) {
>>> +        pvt->csels[0].b_cnt = pvt->csels[1].b_cnt = 4;
>>> +        pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 2;
>>>       } else {
>>>           pvt->csels[0].b_cnt = pvt->csels[1].b_cnt = 8;
>>>           pvt->csels[0].m_cnt = pvt->csels[1].m_cnt = 4;
>>> @@ -850,9 +863,9 @@ static u64 get_error_address(struct mce *m)
>>>       addr = m->addr & GENMASK(start_bit, end_bit);
>>>         /*
>>> -     * Erratum 637 workaround
>>> +     * Erratum 637 workaround for F15h Models 0x00 - 0x0f
>> Same here - RG says this erratum is, like 505, "No fix planned"
>>
>>>        */
>>> -    if (c->x86 == 0x15) {
>>> +    if (c->x86 == 0x15 && c->x86_model != 0x30) {
>>>           struct amd64_pvt *pvt;
>>>           u64 cc6_base, tmp_addr;
>>>           u32 tmp;
>>> @@ -918,6 +931,7 @@ static void read_dram_base_limit_regs(struct 
>>> amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range)
>>>       struct amd_northbridge *nb;
>>>       struct pci_dev *misc, *f1 = NULL;
>>>       struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
>>> +    unsigned int pci_func;
>>>       int off = range << 3;
>>>       u32 llim;
>>>   @@ -942,7 +956,12 @@ static void read_dram_base_limit_regs(struct 
>>> amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range)
>>>           return;
>>>         misc = nb->misc;
>>> -    f1 = pci_get_related_function(misc->vendor, 
>>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F1, misc);
>>> +
>>> +    pci_func = (c->x86_model == 0x30) ? 
>>> PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1
>>> +                      : PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1;
>> Something's wrong with this line :-)
>
> Oh no! (vim auto-complete! :( )
> Will fix this.
>
>>> +
>>> +    f1 = pci_get_related_function(misc->vendor, pci_func, misc);
>>> +
>>>       if (WARN_ON(!f1))
>>>           return;
>>>   @@ -1173,7 +1192,8 @@ static int f15_dbam_to_chip_select(struct 
>>> amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
>>>   }
>>>     /*
>>> - * F16h has only limited cs_modes
>>> + * F16h has only limited cs_modes.
>>> + * F15 M30h follows the same pattern.
>>>    */
>>>   static int f16_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
>>>                   unsigned cs_mode)
>>> @@ -1218,6 +1238,51 @@ static void read_dram_ctl_register(struct 
>>> amd64_pvt *pvt)
>>>   }
>>>     /*
>>> + * Determine channel (DCT) based on the interleaving mode:
>>> + * F15h M30h BKDG, 2.10.12 Memory Interleaving Modes.
>>> + */
>>> +static u8 f15_m30h_determine_channel(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u64 
>>> sys_addr,
>>> +                u8 intlv_en, int num_dcts_intlv, u32 dct_sel)
>> Arg indentation.
> Sorry, will fix.
>>> +{
>>> +    u8 channel = 0;
>>> +    u8 select;
>>> +    u8 intlv_addr = dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt);
>>> +
>>> +    if (!(intlv_en))
>>> +        return (u8)(dct_sel);
>>> +    /*
>>> +    * If num_dcts_intlv == 2, them consider addr bit 8 or addr bit 9
>>> +    * depending on intlv_addr, then return either channel = 0/1/2/3.
>>> +    * If num_dcts_intlv == 4, consider either bits[8:9] or bits[9:10]
>>> +    * depending on intlv_addr, then return the value obtained.
>> No need for that comment.
>>
>>> +    */
>>> +
>>> +    if (num_dcts_intlv == 2) {
>>> +        if (intlv_addr == 0x4)
>>> +            select = (sys_addr >> 8) & BIT(0);
>>> +        else if (intlv_addr == 0x5)
>>> +            select = (sys_addr >> 9) & BIT(0);
>> So, basically you can take care of the two cases together by doing:
>>
>>     select = (sys_addr >> 8) & 0x3;
>>
>> ?
>>
>>> +        else
>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +        /* If select !=0, upper DCT selected, else lower DCT */
>> I think we can see that, no need for the comment.
>>
>>> +        channel = select ? 0x3 : 0;
>>> +
>>> +    } else if (num_dcts_intlv == 4) {
>>> +        if (intlv_addr == 0x4)
>>> +            select =  (sys_addr >> 8) & 0x3;
>>> +        else if (intlv_addr == 0x5)
>>> +            select = (sys_addr >> 9) & 0x3;
>> Ditto here, as above.
>>
>>> +        else
>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +        channel = select;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    return channel;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>>    * Determine channel (DCT) based on the interleaving mode: F10h 
>>> BKDG, 2.8.9 Memory
>>>    * Interleaving Modes.
>>>    */
>>> @@ -1366,6 +1431,10 @@ static int f1x_lookup_addr_in_dct(u64 
>>> in_addr, u8 nid, u8 dct)
>>>                (in_addr & cs_mask), (cs_base & cs_mask));
>>>             if ((in_addr & cs_mask) == (cs_base & cs_mask)) {
>>> +            if (F15H_M30H_CPU) {
>>> +                cs_found =  csrow;
>>> +                break;
>>> +            }
>>>               cs_found = f10_process_possible_spare(pvt, dct, csrow);
>>>                 edac_dbg(1, " MATCH csrow=%d\n", cs_found);
>>> @@ -1492,20 +1561,151 @@ static int f1x_match_to_this_node(struct 
>>> amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range,
>>>       return cs_found;
>>>   }
>>>   -static int f1x_translate_sysaddr_to_cs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u64 
>>> sys_addr,
>>> -                       int *chan_sel)
>>> +/*
>>> + * Routing DRAM Requests algorithm is different for F15h M30h.
>>> + * It is cleaner to use a brand new function rather than
>>> + * adding quirks in the more generic 'f1x_match_to_this_node'.
>>> + * Refer "2.10.5 DRAM Routing Requests" in BKDG for info.
>>> + */
>> This comment belongs in the commit message of this patch.
> Okay.
>
>>> +static int f15_m30h_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, 
>>> unsigned range,
>>> +                  u64 sys_addr, int *chan_sel)
>> Arg indentation
> Sorry, will fix..
>>> +{
>>> +    int cs_found = -EINVAL;
>>> +    int num_dcts_intlv = 0;
>>> +    u64 chan_addr, chan_offset, high_addr_offset;
>>> +    u64 dct_base, dct_limit;
>>> +    u32 dct_cont_base_reg, dct_cont_limit_reg, tmp;
>>> +    u8 channel, alias_channel, leg_mmio_hole;
>>> +
>>> +
>>> +    /*  Read DRAM Control registers specific to F15 M30h. */
>> No need for the comment.
>>
>>> +    amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_BASE, &dct_cont_base_reg);
>>> +    amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_LIMIT, &dct_cont_limit_reg);
>>> +
>>> +    /* Extract F15h M30h specific config */
>> No need for the comment.
>>
>>> +    u64 dhar_offset        = f10_dhar_offset(pvt);
>>> +    u8 dct_offset_en    = (u8) ((dct_cont_base_reg >> 3) & BIT(0));
>>> +    u8 dct_sel        = (u8) ((dct_cont_base_reg >> 4) & 0x7);
>>> +    u8 intlv_addr        = dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt);
>>> +    u8 node_id        = dram_dst_node(pvt, range);
>>> +    u8 intlv_en        = dram_intlv_en(pvt, range);
>>> +
>>> +    edac_dbg(1, "(range %d) SystemAddr= 0x%llx Limit=0x%llx\n",
>>> +         range, sys_addr, get_dram_limit(pvt, range));
>>> +
>>> +    if (!(get_dram_base(pvt, range)  <= sys_addr) &&
>>> +        !(get_dram_limit(pvt, range) >= sys_addr))
>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +    if (dhar_valid(pvt) &&
>>> +        dhar_base(pvt) <= sys_addr &&
>>> +        sys_addr < BIT_64(32)) {
>>> +        amd64_warn("Huh? Address is in the MMIO hole: 0x%016llx\n",
>>> +                sys_addr);
>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Verify sys_addr is within DCT Range. */
>>> +    dct_base = (dct_sel_baseaddr(pvt) << 27);
>>> +    dct_limit = (((dct_cont_limit_reg >> 11) & 0x1FFF) << 27) | 
>>> 0x7FFFFFF;
>>> +    if (!(dct_cont_base_reg & BIT(0)) &&
>>> +        !(dct_base <= sys_addr && dct_limit >= sys_addr)) {
>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Verify number of dct's that participate in channel 
>>> interleaving. */
>>> +    num_dcts_intlv = (int) hweight8(intlv_en);
>>> +
>>> +    if (!(num_dcts_intlv % 2 == 0) || (num_dcts_intlv > 4))
>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +    channel = f15_m30h_determine_channel(pvt, sys_addr, intlv_en,
>>> +                         num_dcts_intlv, dct_sel);
>>> +
>>> +    /* Verify if we stay within the MAX number of channels allowed */
>> s/if//
>>
>>> +    if (channel > 4 || channel < 0)
>>> +        return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +    leg_mmio_hole = (u8) (dct_cont_base_reg >> 1 & BIT(0));
>>> +
>>> +    /* Get normalized DCT addr */
>>> +    if (leg_mmio_hole && (sys_addr >= BIT_64(32)))
>>> +        chan_offset = dhar_offset;
>>> +    else
>>> +        chan_offset = dct_base;
>>> +
>>> +    chan_addr = sys_addr - chan_offset;
>>> +
>>> +    /* remove channel interleave */
>>> +    if (num_dcts_intlv == 2) {
>>> +        if (intlv_addr == 0x4)
>>> +            chan_addr = ((chan_addr >> 9) << 8) |
>>> +                        (chan_addr & 0xff);
>>> +        else if (intlv_addr == 0x5)
>>> +            chan_addr = ((chan_addr >> 10) << 9) |
>>> +                        (chan_addr & 0x1ff);
>>> +        else
>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +    } else if (num_dcts_intlv == 4) {
>>> +        if (intlv_addr == 0x4)
>>> +            chan_addr = ((chan_addr >> 10) << 8) |
>>> +                            (chan_addr & 0xff);
>>> +        else if (intlv_addr == 0x5)
>>> +            chan_addr = ((chan_addr >> 11) << 9) |
>>> +                            (chan_addr & 0x1ff);
>>> +        else
>>> +            return -EINVAL;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    if (dct_offset_en) {
>>> +        amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1,
>>> +                   DRAM_CONT_HIGH_OFF + (int) channel * 4,
>>> +                   &tmp);
>>> +        chan_addr +=  ((tmp >> 11) & 0xfff) << 27;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    /* Set DCTCFGSEL = ChannelSelect */
>> No need for the comment.
>>
>>> +    f15h_select_dct(pvt, channel);
>>> +
>>> +    edac_dbg(1, "   Normalized DCT addr: 0x%llx\n", chan_addr);
>>> +    /* Find the Chip select.. */
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * NOTE: if channel = 3, then alias it to 1.
>>> +     * This is because, in F15 M30h, there is support for
>>> +     * 4 DCT's, but only 2 are currently included in the architecture.
>>> +     * They are DCT0 and DCT3. But we have read all registers of DCT3
>>> +     * into pvt->csels[1]. So we need to use '1' here to get correct
>>> +     * info. Refer F15 M30h BKDG Section 2.10 and 2.10.3 for 
>>> clarifications
>>> +     */
>> Comment needs block formatting.
> Okay.
>
>>> +
>>> +    alias_channel =  (channel == 3) ? 1 : channel;
>>> +
>>> +    cs_found = f1x_lookup_addr_in_dct(chan_addr, node_id, 
>>> alias_channel);
>>> +
>>> +    if (cs_found >= 0)
>>> +        *chan_sel = alias_channel;
>>> +
>>> +    return cs_found;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int
>>> +f1x_translate_sysaddr_to_cs(struct amd64_pvt *pvt,
>>> +                u64 sys_addr,
>>> +                int *chan_sel)
>>>   {
>> Arg indentation.
>>
>>>       int cs_found = -EINVAL;
>>>       unsigned range;
>>>         for (range = 0; range < DRAM_RANGES; range++) {
>>> -
>>>           if (!dram_rw(pvt, range))
>>>               continue;
>>> -
>>> -        if ((get_dram_base(pvt, range)  <= sys_addr) &&
>>> -            (get_dram_limit(pvt, range) >= sys_addr)) {
>>> -
>>> +        if (F15H_M30H_CPU)
>>> +            cs_found = f15_m30h_match_to_this_node(pvt, range,
>>> +                                   sys_addr,
>>> +                                   chan_sel);
>>> +        else if ((get_dram_base(pvt, range)  <= sys_addr) &&
>>> +             (get_dram_limit(pvt, range) >= sys_addr)) {
>>>               cs_found = f1x_match_to_this_node(pvt, range,
>>>                                 sys_addr, chan_sel);
>>>               if (cs_found >= 0)
>>> @@ -1624,6 +1824,17 @@ static struct amd64_family_type 
>>> amd64_family_types[] = {
>>>               .read_dct_pci_cfg    = f15_read_dct_pci_cfg,
>>>           }
>>>       },
>>> +    [F15_M30H_CPUS] = {
>>> +        .ctl_name = "F15h_M30h",
>>> +        .f1_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1,
>>> +        .f3_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F3,
>>> +        .ops = {
>>> +            .early_channel_count    = f1x_early_channel_count,
>>> +            .map_sysaddr_to_csrow    = f1x_map_sysaddr_to_csrow,
>>> +            .dbam_to_cs        = f16_dbam_to_chip_select,
>>> +            .read_dct_pci_cfg    = f15_read_dct_pci_cfg,
>>> +        }
>>> +    },
>>>       [F16_CPUS] = {
>>>           .ctl_name = "F16h",
>>>           .f1_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_NB_F1,
>>> @@ -2388,27 +2599,44 @@ static void setup_mci_misc_attrs(struct 
>>> mem_ctl_info *mci,
>>>   static struct amd64_family_type *amd64_per_family_init(struct 
>>> amd64_pvt *pvt)
>>>   {
>>>       u8 fam = boot_cpu_data.x86;
>>> +    u8 model = boot_cpu_data.x86_model;
>>>       struct amd64_family_type *fam_type = NULL;
>>>         switch (fam) {
>>>       case 0xf:
>>>           fam_type        = &amd64_family_types[K8_CPUS];
>>>           pvt->ops        = &amd64_family_types[K8_CPUS].ops;
>>> +        pvt->family        = fam;
>> You could call it pvt->fam for less typing if you like.
> Sure!, and I will take it outside the switch as suggested below.
>>> +        pvt->model        = model;
>>>           break;
>>>         case 0x10:
>>>           fam_type        = &amd64_family_types[F10_CPUS];
>>>           pvt->ops        = &amd64_family_types[F10_CPUS].ops;
>>> +        pvt->family        = fam;
>>> +        pvt->model        = model;
>>>           break;
>>>         case 0x15:
>>> +        if (model == 0x30) {
>>> +            fam_type    = &amd64_family_types[F15_M30H_CPUS];
>>> +            pvt->ops    = &amd64_family_types[F15_M30H_CPUS].ops;
>>> +            pvt->family    = fam;
>>> +            pvt->model    = model;
>>> +            break;
>>> +        }
>>> +
>>>           fam_type        = &amd64_family_types[F15_CPUS];
>>>           pvt->ops        = &amd64_family_types[F15_CPUS].ops;
>>> +        pvt->family        = fam;
>>> +        pvt->model        = model;
>>>           break;
>>>         case 0x16:
>>>           fam_type        = &amd64_family_types[F16_CPUS];
>>>           pvt->ops        = &amd64_family_types[F16_CPUS].ops;
>>> +        pvt->family        = fam;
>>> +        pvt->model        = model;
>> This ->family and ->model assignment is repeated in every case. What
>> do you think, could it probably be done only once, outside the switch
>> statement?
>>
>>>           break;
>>>         default:
>>> @@ -2638,6 +2866,14 @@ static 
>>> DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(amd64_pci_table) = {
>>>       },
>>>       {
>>>           .vendor        = PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD,
>>> +        .device        = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F2,
>>> +        .subvendor    = PCI_ANY_ID,
>>> +        .subdevice    = PCI_ANY_ID,
>>> +        .class        = 0,
>>> +        .class_mask    = 0,
>>> +    },
>>> +    {
>>> +        .vendor        = PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD,
>>>           .device        = PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_NB_F2,
>>>           .subvendor    = PCI_ANY_ID,
>>>           .subdevice    = PCI_ANY_ID,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>>> index 2c6f113..ff15f14 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
>>> @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@
>>>   /*
>>>    * PCI-defined configuration space registers
>>>    */
>>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F1 0x141b
>>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_M30H_NB_F2 0x141c
>>>   #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F1    0x1601
>>>   #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_15H_NB_F2    0x1602
>>>   #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_16H_NB_F1    0x1531
>>> @@ -181,13 +183,24 @@
>>>   #define DRAM_BASE_LO            0x40
>>>   #define DRAM_LIMIT_LO            0x44
>>>   -#define dram_intlv_en(pvt, i) ((u8)((pvt->ranges[i].base.lo >> 8) 
>>> & 0x7))
>>> +/*
>>> + * F15 M30h DRAM Controller Base/Limit
>>> + * D18F1x2[1C:00]
>>> + */
>>> +#define DRAM_CONT_BASE            0x200
>>> +#define DRAM_CONT_LIMIT            0x204
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * F15 M30h DRAM Controller High Addre Offset
>>> + * D18F1x2[4C:40]
>>> + */
>>> +#define DRAM_CONT_HIGH_OFF      0x240
>>> +
>>>   #define dram_rw(pvt, i) ((u8)(pvt->ranges[i].base.lo & 0x3))
>>>   #define dram_intlv_sel(pvt, i) ((u8)((pvt->ranges[i].lim.lo >> 8) 
>>> & 0x7))
>>>   #define dram_dst_node(pvt, i) ((u8)(pvt->ranges[i].lim.lo & 0x7))
>>>     #define DHAR                0xf0
>>> -#define dhar_valid(pvt)            ((pvt)->dhar & BIT(0))
>>>   #define dhar_mem_hoist_valid(pvt)    ((pvt)->dhar & BIT(1))
>>>   #define dhar_base(pvt)            ((pvt)->dhar & 0xff000000)
>>>   #define k8_dhar_offset(pvt)        (((pvt)->dhar & 0x0000ff00) << 16)
>>> @@ -234,8 +247,6 @@
>>>   #define DDR3_MODE            BIT(8)
>>>     #define DCT_SEL_LO            0x110
>>> -#define dct_sel_baseaddr(pvt)        ((pvt)->dct_sel_lo & 0xFFFFF800)
>>> -#define dct_sel_interleave_addr(pvt) (((pvt)->dct_sel_lo >> 6) & 0x3)
>>>   #define dct_high_range_enabled(pvt)    ((pvt)->dct_sel_lo & BIT(0))
>>>   #define dct_interleave_enabled(pvt)    ((pvt)->dct_sel_lo & BIT(2))
>>>   @@ -293,10 +304,14 @@
>>>   /* MSRs */
>>>   #define MSR_MCGCTL_NBE            BIT(4)
>>>   +/* Helper Macro for F15h M30h */
>>> +#define F15H_M30H_CPU            ((pvt->family == 0x15) && \
>>> +                     (pvt->model == 0x30))
>> Please drop this macro - the condition is not that complicated to write
>> out and not error prone.
> Okay.
>>>   enum amd_families {
>>>       K8_CPUS = 0,
>>>       F10_CPUS,
>>>       F15_CPUS,
>>> +    F15_M30H_CPUS,
>>>       F16_CPUS,
>>>       NUM_FAMILIES,
>>>   };
>>> @@ -337,6 +352,8 @@ struct amd64_pvt {
>>>       struct pci_dev *F1, *F2, *F3;
>>>         u16 mc_node_id;        /* MC index of this MC node */
>>> +    u8 family;        /* CPU family */
>>> +    u8 model;        /* CPU model */
>>>       int ext_model;        /* extended model value of this node */
>>>       int channel_count;
>>>   @@ -414,6 +431,14 @@ static inline u16 extract_syndrome(u64 status)
>>>       return ((status >> 47) & 0xff) | ((status >> 16) & 0xff00);
>>>   }
>>>   +static inline u8 dct_sel_interleave_addr(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
>>> +{
>>> +    if (F15H_M30H_CPU)
>>> +        return (((pvt->dct_sel_hi >> 9) & 0x1) << 2) |
>>> +            ((pvt->dct_sel_lo >> 6) & 0x3);
>>> +
>>> +    return    ((pvt)->dct_sel_lo >> 6) & 0x3;
>>> +}
>>>   /*
>>>    * per-node ECC settings descriptor
>>>    */
>>> @@ -504,3 +529,33 @@ static inline void enable_caches(void *dummy)
>>>   {
>>>       write_cr0(read_cr0() & ~X86_CR0_CD);
>>>   }
>>> +
>>> +static inline u8 dram_intlv_en(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned int i)
>>> +{
>>> +    u32 tmp;
>>> +    if (F15H_M30H_CPU) {
>> u32 tmp inside the if-statement.
>>
>>> +        amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_LIMIT, &tmp);
>>> +        return (u8) tmp & 0xF;
>>> +    }
>>> +    return (u8) (pvt->ranges[i].base.lo >> 8) & 0x7;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline u8 dhar_valid(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
>>> +{
>>> +    u32 tmp;
>>> +    if (F15H_M30H_CPU) {
>> ditto.
>>
>>> +        amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_BASE, &tmp);
>>> +        return (tmp >> 1) & BIT(0);
>>> +    }
>>> +    return (pvt)->dhar & BIT(0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline u32 dct_sel_baseaddr(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
>>> +{
>>> +    u32 tmp;
>>> +    if (F15H_M30H_CPU) {
>> ditto.
>>
>>> +        amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F1, DRAM_CONT_BASE, &tmp);
>>> +        return (tmp >> 11) & 0x1FFF;
>>> +    }
>>> +    return (pvt)->dct_sel_lo & 0xFFFFF800;
>>> +}
>
> will send out changes in V3;
>
> Thanks,
> Aravind.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/