Message-ID: <1375829481.10300.197.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: acpi_bind_one()/acpi_unbind_one() cleanups
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 16:51:21 -0600
In-Reply-To: <7035316.4VkUaO4qFC@vostro.rjw.lan>
References: <3015032.qfOqgEVZKP@vostro.rjw.lan>
	 <1375823736.10300.196.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
	 <7035316.4VkUaO4qFC@vostro.rjw.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1204
Lines: 31

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 00:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 03:15:36 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 02:22 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > > 
> > > The following 5 patches clean up a little mess in acpi_bind_one() and
> > > acpi_unbind_one().  They are on top of current linux-next plus the patch
> > > at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2839101/ .
> > > 
> > > [1/5] Move duplicated code from acpi_bind_one()/acpi_unbind_one() to a separate
> > >       function.
> > 
> > I think the name of acpi_bind_physnode_name() is a bit confusing as if
> > it would make some persistent binding.  So, I'd suggest to rename it to
> > acpi_set_physnode_name().
> 
> In fact, the plan was to make it mean "physical node name for acpi_bind", but
> the execution was somewhat sloppy. ;-)
> 
> I think I'll call it acpi_physnode_link_name(), that should be clear enough.

Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/